2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2010.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision-makers' perspectives on the use of bioaccessibility for risk-based regulation of contaminated land

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in a study of five different methods on three test soils (Oomen et al, 2002)a wide range of bioaccessibility values were found: for As 6-95%, 1-19%, and 10-59%; for Cd 7-92%, 5-92%, and 6-99%; and for Pb 4-91%, 1-56%, and 3-90%. This made comparison of data difficult to carry out in a subjective manner causing regulators and risk assessors some concern (Environment Agency, 2005b;Environment Agency, 2005a;Environment Agency, 2007;Richardson, 2008;Scheckel et al, 2009;Latawiec et al, 2010). To overcome this problem, BARGE undertook a joint decision to progress the development of a harmonised in vitro bioaccessibility method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in a study of five different methods on three test soils (Oomen et al, 2002)a wide range of bioaccessibility values were found: for As 6-95%, 1-19%, and 10-59%; for Cd 7-92%, 5-92%, and 6-99%; and for Pb 4-91%, 1-56%, and 3-90%. This made comparison of data difficult to carry out in a subjective manner causing regulators and risk assessors some concern (Environment Agency, 2005b;Environment Agency, 2005a;Environment Agency, 2007;Richardson, 2008;Scheckel et al, 2009;Latawiec et al, 2010). To overcome this problem, BARGE undertook a joint decision to progress the development of a harmonised in vitro bioaccessibility method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A better understanding of the 'bioavailable' or 'bioaccesible' contaminant concentrations offers an opportunity to better refine contaminant exposure assessments and thus to more effectively target remedial efforts and health/welfare protection measures, as recognized by local regulators and practitioners across England and Wales (Latawiec at al., 2010). UK Guidance reflects this opportunity for refinement in facilitating the incorporation of bioaccessibility data into the CLEA modelling process (Jeffries and Martin, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, risk based remediation that considers social, economic and environmental factors and directed towards eliminating or minimising risk to human and environmental health as a cost effective approach has been recently gaining more recognition for remediation of contaminated sites worldwide (Reinikainen and Sorvari 2016). This approach considers contaminant bioavailability therefore its exposure and risk to biota as central rather than total contaminant which saves the industry substantial costs from unnecessary remediation (Latawiec et al 2010). …”
Section: Risk-based Remediation Of Amls-a Sustainable Approachmentioning
confidence: 98%