2020
DOI: 10.3390/math8010070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision-Making Approach under Pythagorean Fuzzy Yager Weighted Operators

Abstract: In fuzzy set theory, t-norms and t-conorms are fundamental binary operators. Yager proposed respective parametric families of both t-norms and t-conorms. In this paper, we apply these operators for the analysis of Pythagorean fuzzy sets. For this purpose, we introduce six families of aggregation operators named Pythagorean fuzzy Yager weighted averaging aggregation, Pythagorean fuzzy Yager ordered weighted averaging aggregation, Pythagorean fuzzy Yager hybrid weighted averaging aggregation, Pythagorean fuzzy Y… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Operators. To compute performance and validity of our proposed operators, here we aggregate the same data using different operators, namely, Pythagorean fuzzy Yager weighted average (PFYWA) [14] and Pythagorean fuzzy Yager weighted geometric (PFYWG) [14] operators. e computed results by applying these operators are summarized in Table 4 and shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Comparison With Pythagorean Fuzzy Yager Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Operators. To compute performance and validity of our proposed operators, here we aggregate the same data using different operators, namely, Pythagorean fuzzy Yager weighted average (PFYWA) [14] and Pythagorean fuzzy Yager weighted geometric (PFYWG) [14] operators. e computed results by applying these operators are summarized in Table 4 and shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Comparison With Pythagorean Fuzzy Yager Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e main logic behind our proposed approach is that the PFS handles the situation where μ 2 + ] 2 ≤ 1 but fails in situations where μ 3 + ] 3 ≤ 1. If we assign MD 0.8 and NMD 0.7, then the proposed operators in [14] fail to cope the situation. at is why, we need the FFS and our proposed theory.…”
Section: Comparison With Pythagorean Fuzzy Yager Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Garg (2018b) has also considered Linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy sets, correlation coefficient between Pythagorean fuzzy sets (Garg, 2016) and generalized Pythagorean fuzzy geometric interactive aggregation operators using Einstein operations (Garg, 2018c). Certain decision making methods are discussed by the authors (Shahzadi, Akram and Al‐Kenani, 2020; Waseem, Akram and Alcantud, 2019). Ramot, Milo, Fiedman and Kandel (2002) initiated the idea of complex fuzzy set (CFS) by extending the range of membership from [0,1] to complex numbers within unit disk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Akram et al [18] proposed different Pythagorean Dombi fuzzy AOs and studied their applications in MCDM. Shahzadi et al [19] introduced Pythagorean fuzzy Yager AOs for decision making. Peng and Yang [20] investigated different basic properties of interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy AOs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%