1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-8352(99)00083-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision making for facility layout problem solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dweiri (1999) presented a distinct methodology to develop a crisp activity relationship chart using fuzzy set theory and pair-wise comparisons of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Yaman and Balibek (1999) presented a decision making methodology for solving FLPs. Chan and Sha (1999) presented a new multi-objective heuristic algorithm for resolving the FLP.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dweiri (1999) presented a distinct methodology to develop a crisp activity relationship chart using fuzzy set theory and pair-wise comparisons of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Yaman and Balibek (1999) presented a decision making methodology for solving FLPs. Chan and Sha (1999) presented a new multi-objective heuristic algorithm for resolving the FLP.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies on MCDM have been found in the field of industrial engineering, where criterion values are in the form of crisp numbers or fuzzy numbers (Chiadamrong, 1999;Chuu, 2009;Huang, Chiu, Yeh, & Chang, 2009;Sarker & Quaddus, 2002;Vasant, 2006;Wang & Elhag, 2007;Yaman & Balibek, 1999). However, in some practical MCDM problems such as selection for waste treatment facility (Lahdelma, Salminen, & Hokkanen, 2002), production process control (Nowak, Trzaskalik, Trzpiot, & Zaras, 2002), elevator group configuration (Tervonen, Hakonen, & Lahdelma, 2008), measuring quality of life (Zawisza & Trzpiot, 2002) and so on, some criterion values could be in the form of stochastic variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%