2022
DOI: 10.3389/feart.2022.962362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision-making fusion of InSAR technology and offset tracking to study the deformation of large gradients in mining areas-Xuemiaotan mine as an example

Abstract: The multi-level disturbance of underground and surface caused by coal mining activities intensifies the deterioration of the ecological environment in the mining area. Among them, the uneven settlement caused by coal mining is the most intuitive manifestation of surface environmental damage. The uneven settlement in the mining area has the characteristics of large settlement magnitude and severe deformation. Therefore, based on 15 Sentinel-1A image data, this paper uses three methods: SBAS InSAR, continuous D-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where 𝑘 is the integer cycle ambiguity of the predicted phase. Next, the residual phase of the monitored phase is obtained by removing the predicted phase from the monitored phase, as shown in Equation (14). The method of unwrapping the residual phase is adopted to reduce the difficulty of monitoring phase unwrapping, as shown in Equation (15): Furthermore, using the geological mining parameters and the prediction parameters, the 3-D displacements (W j , U j E , and U j N ) at the corresponding pixel of the target area is predicted based on the BPM.…”
Section: Insar Phase Unwrapping Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where 𝑘 is the integer cycle ambiguity of the predicted phase. Next, the residual phase of the monitored phase is obtained by removing the predicted phase from the monitored phase, as shown in Equation (14). The method of unwrapping the residual phase is adopted to reduce the difficulty of monitoring phase unwrapping, as shown in Equation (15): Furthermore, using the geological mining parameters and the prediction parameters, the 3-D displacements (W j , U j E , and U j N ) at the corresponding pixel of the target area is predicted based on the BPM.…”
Section: Insar Phase Unwrapping Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, to overcome the above difficulties, the following methods have been developed by scholars: Method (I) multi-track InSAR [7][8][9][10], InSAR + Offset Tracking/MAI [11][12][13][14], and InSAR + GPS [15][16][17]; Method (II) Prior model + InSAR [18][19][20]; Method (III) InSAR + probability integral method (PIM) [21][22][23][24]. Method (I) can theoretically obtain onedimensional or two-dimensional observations in multiple directions, thereby the number of additional observation equations is increased and the 3-D deformations observation information is supplemented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…InSAR measures the surface deformation along the line of sight (LOS), which restricts the understanding of the movement mechanisms of the mining goaf [18]. Efforts [19], [20] have been made to overcome this limitation, particularly the integration with relevant data, such as offset tracking data [21], [22], airborne data [23], [24], leveling data [25], GPS data [26], and other auxiliary data [27], [28]. Another widely used strategy is the probability integral method (PIM) [29], [30], which is based on the surface movement model, and is frequently combined with TS-InSAR for subsidence analysis in mining areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have implemented an elastic impedance inversion method for the fluid factor and brittleness coefficient, using both as effective pore-fluid bulk moduli to estimate coal structural distribution [9,10]. However, the use of multiple solutions for the inversion reduces the accuracy of the predictions, whereas they become more accurate with the addition of rich logging parameters, but the well extrapolation process still requires the inversion of seismic waves in order to solve for the relevant parameters, resulting in a certain error accumulation [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%