Decision Making in Shifts to Online Teaching: Analysing Reflective Narratives from Staff Working in African Higher Educational Institutions

Abstract

Many higher education institutions moved from in-person to online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic, but these shifts have a longer history and potential. They require challenging individual and collective decision making by staff, beyond their usual repertoire of practice. This paper, therefore, aims to understand the nature of decisions that staff made as they moved to online teaching, the reasons, processes, and reflections on the perceived impacts. Eighty-four participants with diverse roles connected to moving online from four institutions across Africa were purposively sampled. Using a constructivist paradigm and qualitative approach, participants were invited to describe decision-making experiences through short narratives with prompts around their context, decisions, and impacts. Twenty-two of these participants attended a workshop to augment the narrative data and identify good practices. Qualitative analysis directed by Activity Theory concepts revealed that decisions related to policy and rules, pedagogy, community, and technology were frequently cited by participants. The main objective expressed in these narratives was maintaining the continuity of education for students. However, mixed impacts were observed on student engagement, and further decisions were made in response to this. Common challenges related to tools and technology, and similarly, the biggest tension for implementing the decisions was found between tools and technology and the participants or their communities. Good practices include updating policies and introducing continuous assessment. Implications for reflective professional practice are discussed, including how previous practices are initially drawn on to try to reproduce in-person teaching online but then adapt in recognition of the tensions this raises.

Equitable Access to Higher Education Learning and Assessment: Perspectives from Low-Resource Contexts

“…"Whereas Kenya was physically colonised by Britain, Nepal was and still is ideologically colonised by the west"; thus, education in both countries has been impacted by Western ideologies (Nganga et al 2021: 42). In addition, our contextual knowledge gained from previous research conducted in these countries (Dawadi, Giri & Simkhada 2020;Coughlan et al 2023;Goshtasbpour et al 2022) gives us a solid foundation for the study. We had some awareness of local pandemic-related challenges and considered it important to understand how students and teachers were dealing with them and what could be learnt in terms of implications for future digital learning environments.…”

Supported Open Learning and Decoloniality: Critical Reflections on Three Case Studies

“…To meaningfully scope this study, a corpus of different outputs from across the three projects formed the basis for our reflections on the relationship between SOL and decoloniality. The materials used as the basis for our reflections are collections of research outputs from the projects [54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66].…”

Does Distance Education in the Developing Context Need More Research? Building Practice into Theory (Volume Two)

“…A perceived gap of the quality of education during the COVID-19 pandemic exists which requires more research. Still parts of Africa lag in development of distance learning technologies while other parts are highly developed: this has resulted in the identification of several challenges including digital divide, limited technology access and skills, home environments which are unsuitable to learning, and limited resources(Coughlan et al 2021). Another explanation for slower take-up could be that shifts to online teaching and learning are complicated and require a combination of skills regarding pedagogical, technological, administrative, and strategic elements.We explore trends in distance education research in Africa grounded on connectivism, a theory for a digital age where technology tools positively influence the learning landscape allowing for collaborative learning and learner engagement which help to promote critical thinking and other twenty-first century skills(Siemens 2005).…”