2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0394.2007.00428.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision‐making method using a visual approach for cluster analysis problems; indicative classification algorithms and grouping scope

Abstract: Currently, classifying samples into a fixed number of clusters (i.e. supervised cluster analysis) as well as unsupervised cluster analysis are limited in their ability to support 'cross-algorithms' analysis. It is well known that each cluster analysis algorithm yields different results (i.e. a different classification); even running the same algorithm with two different similarity measures commonly yields different results. Researchers usually choose the preferred algorithm and similarity measure according to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the higher Global level seems equivalent to the 1985 map, which, excluding independent countries, comprised eight clusters. Third, another analysis using the multi-algorithm voting method (Bittman & Gelbard, 2007 further supports that 11 is the preferred number of clusters for our dataset. 9 Relative adjacency is inferred by inter-cluster congruency level: for example, the Confucian and Far Eastern Global clusters merge at a height of 0.79 in the dendrogram, indicating that they are closer to each other than to any other Global cluster.…”
Section: Mds Of Global Clustersmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Second, the higher Global level seems equivalent to the 1985 map, which, excluding independent countries, comprised eight clusters. Third, another analysis using the multi-algorithm voting method (Bittman & Gelbard, 2007 further supports that 11 is the preferred number of clusters for our dataset. 9 Relative adjacency is inferred by inter-cluster congruency level: for example, the Confucian and Far Eastern Global clusters merge at a height of 0.79 in the dendrogram, indicating that they are closer to each other than to any other Global cluster.…”
Section: Mds Of Global Clustersmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…This procedure is ideal for large amounts of data (e.g., N 200), is applicable to both categorical and continuous data, and is able to automatically determine the optimal number of clusters for a given data set (Bittmann and Gelbard, 2007). Cluster analysis is a technique of identifying subgroups of cases in a specific population based on shared characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome these shortcomings, we used the method developed by Bittmann and Gelbard (2007) known as Multi-Algorithms Voting. Multi-Algorithms Voting is a decision support methodology for a cross-algorithm presentation in which all clusters are presented together in a ''tetris-like format".…”
Section: Cluster Analysis -Visualization Of Multi-algorithm Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ward: This method calculates the centroid for each cluster and the square of the likelihood measure of each sample in both the cluster and the centroid. The two clusters, which when united have the smallest (negative) effect on the sum of likelihood measures, are the clusters that need to be united (Bittmann & Gelbard, 2007).…”
Section: Cluster Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation