Decision-Making Model with Game Theory Algorithms in Education

Abstract

Information was obtained through an interview with a headmaster and regional coordinator, revealing that the subject was manipulated within a game. The convergence of the research results shows collaboration in the game theory algorithm, which directs the subject to a decision determined by the scenario maker. Game theory is an incremental derivative model designed to minimize alternative complexity. The research employed a qualitative approach, incorporating historical research and focused interviews. This context applies to the subject, namely student alumni who are classified as idealists with substandard economic backgrounds. Conflict arises by implanting memories with the aim of prompting the subject participates in competing for his welfare through the state civil service appointment (ASN) via the government employees with employment agreements (PPPK)/candidates for civil servants (CPNS) test. Game modeling in the form of model schools with Ericsonian heterosuggestions places the subject to a prisoner’s dilemma situation. A weakness is identified when the game cannot be used to make decisions with different matrix orders. Game theory effectively instills belief in passion and subject free will in the final decision because the decision objectives differ between scenario makers, leading to the best alternative and the subject satisfaction factor.
 Keywords: decision making, game theory, education