Decision‐Making Models and Decision Support

Lehto, Mark R.; Nah, Fiona Fui‐Hoon

doi:10.1002/0470048204.ch8

Cited by 22 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 161 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Conflict among decision-makers, particularly substantive conflict that involves opposition at the intellectual level, is shown to have positive effects upon group decisions by promoting better understanding of the issues involved (Lehto and Nah 2005). At the MDTM inconsistencies in findings between radiology, pathology and clinical staff are resolved through teasing out detail in discussion.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Achieving Diagnosis by Consensus

Kane

Luz

2009

Comput Supported Coop Work

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper provides an analysis of the collaborative work conducted at a multidisciplinary medical team meeting, where a patient's definitive diagnosis is agreed, by consensus. The features that distinguish this process of diagnostic work by consensus are examined in depth. The current use of technology to support this collaborative activity is described, and experienced deficiencies are identified. Emphasis is placed on the visual and perceptual difficulty for individual specialities in making interpretations, and on how, through collaboration in discussion, definitive diagnosis is actually achieved. The challenge for providing adequate support for the multidisciplinary team at their meeting is outlined, given the multifaceted nature of the setting, i.e. patient management, educational, organizational and social functions, that need to be satisfied.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Achieving Diagnosis by Consensus

Kane

Luz

2009

Comput Supported Coop Work

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Th e more complex the technology, the more essential this task is. It can even be critical in the usage of complex technologies, such as power stations or fi nancial investment software, where the user has to be able to make up his or her mind concerning diff erent courses of actions (Lehto and Nah 2006 ), and where the quality of decisions may entail, for example, security and economic risks.…”

Section: Critical Factors Of 'Being Able To Use'mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Decisions can be made alone or with other people, and they can be unifi ed or confl ict driven (Lehto and Nah 2006 ). In any case, the user has to make preferences among the possible alternatives.…”

Section: To Decide and To Thinkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Designing for Life

Saariluoma

Cañas

Leikas

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Indirect-measurement techniques avoid directly asking people to rate the importance of attributes; instead, subjects simply state their preference for different alternatives [14]. Moreover, Huber et al provided evidence that giving relative preference on pairs is better than rating an individual profile in predicting choice [11].…”

Section: ) Single-attribute Utility Functionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Experiment on Multi-attribute Sorting Panel in E-commerce

Yan

2015

2015 IEEE 39th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Grounded in users' online purchasing behaviors, we developed a multi-attribute sorting panel for online shopping and incorporated opinion attributes in it. Furthermore, the multi-attribute sorting panel was expanded to three alternative designs that mainly differ in the way of eliciting relative importance for attributes, called direct assessment, indifference method, and indirect measurement. Then, we used online hotel booking as the test domain to compare the three alternative designs. Through analysis of objective and subjective measures, the multiattribute sorting function embedded with opinion attributes has been verified to be effective. Moreover, the direct way outperforms the indifference and indirect ways regarding perceived decision accuracy, cognitive effort, satisfaction and intention to use in an online environment.

show abstract

Decision‐Making Models and Decision Support

Cited by 22 publications

References 161 publications

Achieving Diagnosis by Consensus

Achieving Diagnosis by Consensus

Designing for Life

Experiment on Multi-attribute Sorting Panel in E-commerce

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About