2014
DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-13-183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision-making on intra-household allocation of bed nets in Uganda: do households prioritize the most vulnerable members?

Abstract: BackgroundAccess to insecticide-treated bed nets has increased substantially in recent years, but ownership and use remain well below 100% in many malaria endemic areas. Understanding decision-making around net allocation in households with too few nets is essential to ensuring protection of the most vulnerable. This study explores household net allocation preferences and practices across four districts in Uganda.MethodsData collection consisted of eight focus group discussions, twelve in-depth interviews, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
28
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were found in a study in Indonesia, Timor-Leste [41]. As our studies and that of Lam et al [42] in Uganda illustrate, most populations understand the vulnerability of pregnant women and children under 5 years of age, which has been conveyed by previous policies through the LLIN distribution strategy and other communications. This information has had an impact on the choice of LLIN bene ciaries in households [42].…”
Section: Decision-making Process For Llin Recipientssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar results were found in a study in Indonesia, Timor-Leste [41]. As our studies and that of Lam et al [42] in Uganda illustrate, most populations understand the vulnerability of pregnant women and children under 5 years of age, which has been conveyed by previous policies through the LLIN distribution strategy and other communications. This information has had an impact on the choice of LLIN bene ciaries in households [42].…”
Section: Decision-making Process For Llin Recipientssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…As our studies and that of Lam et al [42] in Uganda illustrate, most populations understand the vulnerability of pregnant women and children under 5 years of age, which has been conveyed by previous policies through the LLIN distribution strategy and other communications. This information has had an impact on the choice of LLIN bene ciaries in households [42]. Children under 5 years of age bene t from LLINs, sometimes considerably more than pregnant women, but to the detriment of those over 5 years of age, especially when LLINs are more accessible [22,[40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Decision-making Process For Llin Recipientsmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Caregivers may prioritize younger children, who are more susceptible to the sequelae of malaria, as has been previously documented in the household allocation of malaria prevention tools in Uganda. 28 Interestingly, in the bivariate regression model, older children were more likely to receive prompt care, although this association vanished in the multivariate regression model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The net allocation exercise rankings, where respondents prioritized infants and pregnant women for best nets, falls in line with pre-universal coverage strategies of prioritizing vulnerable populations, and echoes priorities from studies in Uganda [20] and Tanzania [21] and analyses of recent DHS and the Malaria Indicator Survey (MIS) data [22]. While many families did express concern that there were not enough nets to cover all of their family members, they felt it was important to prioritize more vulnerable family members.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%