2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-16373-9_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision-Making Ontology for Information System Engineering

Abstract: Abstract. Information Systems (IS) engineering (ISE) processes contain steps where decisions must be made. Moreover, the growing role of IS in organizations involves requirements for ISE such as quality, cost and time. Considering these aspects implies that the number of researches dealing with decision-making (DM) in ISE increasingly grows. As DM becomes widespread in the ISE field, it is necessary to build a representation, shared between researchers and practitioners, of DM concepts and their relations with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, in [20] a set of inference rules as well as an ontological representation of the multi-criteria method of AHP were developed. Earlier studies of systematized knowledge about various aspects of decision-making are also presented [21,22]. One of the approaches is founded on using an ontology knowledge model integrating knowledge about a decision-making process [21].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, in [20] a set of inference rules as well as an ontological representation of the multi-criteria method of AHP were developed. Earlier studies of systematized knowledge about various aspects of decision-making are also presented [21,22]. One of the approaches is founded on using an ontology knowledge model integrating knowledge about a decision-making process [21].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, DM in IS engineering has several lacks: (i) decisions are not formalized in terms of alternatives and criteria, their consequences are not analyzed, decisions are not transparent, (ii) at intuitive and ad hoc decisions overshadow method-based ones, (iii) and there is no tool which covers a complete DM process even if DM tools exist. To overcome these drawbacks, some studies are made, for instance a generic DM process is proposed (Kornyshova 2010) and an ontology of the DM concepts is elaborated (Kornyshova & Deneckère 2010).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The DM ontology [4] is a representation, shared between researchers and practitioners, of DM concepts, which formalizes DM knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%