2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-78570-3_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision-Making Process on Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Embedding sustainability principles into decision-making processes also creates challenges for decision makers, including diverse and wide-ranging interpretations of sustainability principles (Dahl, 2012;Nambiar and Chitty, 2014;Fonseca et al, 2021), which can hinder the adoption of sustainability programs. Accordingly, requiring senior management figures to account for sustainability initiatives into their decision-making processes requires a broad shift from a singular focus on financial considerations (Gladwin et al, 1995;Crane and Ruebottom, 2011;Dyllick and Muff, 2016) to one that considers the social, financial and environmental facets of sustainability programs that take into account a range of stakeholders (Avery and Bergsteiner, 2011;Perrott, 2014).…”
Section: Governance and Decision-making Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Embedding sustainability principles into decision-making processes also creates challenges for decision makers, including diverse and wide-ranging interpretations of sustainability principles (Dahl, 2012;Nambiar and Chitty, 2014;Fonseca et al, 2021), which can hinder the adoption of sustainability programs. Accordingly, requiring senior management figures to account for sustainability initiatives into their decision-making processes requires a broad shift from a singular focus on financial considerations (Gladwin et al, 1995;Crane and Ruebottom, 2011;Dyllick and Muff, 2016) to one that considers the social, financial and environmental facets of sustainability programs that take into account a range of stakeholders (Avery and Bergsteiner, 2011;Perrott, 2014).…”
Section: Governance and Decision-making Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%