2017
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision-Making Processes in Social Contexts

Abstract: Over the past half-century, scholars in the interdisciplinary field of Judgment and Decision Making have amassed a trove of findings, theories, and prescriptions regarding the processes ordinary people enact when making choices. But this body of knowledge has had little influence on sociology. Sociological research on choice emphasizes how features of the social environment shape individual behavior, not people’s underlying decision processes. Our aim in this article is to provide an overview of selected ideas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
145
0
11

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 194 publications
(167 reference statements)
6
145
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…We conducted an additional set of model runs by using a more realistic “2-phase” decision rule, 33 in which agents decided from which retailer to purchase tobacco products after ruling out some retailers on the basis of maximum acceptable price, maximum acceptable distance, or type of retailer. Both density reduction and cost increase results showed very similar patterns to the main model runs (see Table B-1 and Figure B-1 in Appendix B, available as a supplement to the online version of this article at http://www.ajph.org).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conducted an additional set of model runs by using a more realistic “2-phase” decision rule, 33 in which agents decided from which retailer to purchase tobacco products after ruling out some retailers on the basis of maximum acceptable price, maximum acceptable distance, or type of retailer. Both density reduction and cost increase results showed very similar patterns to the main model runs (see Table B-1 and Figure B-1 in Appendix B, available as a supplement to the online version of this article at http://www.ajph.org).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of data identifies not only the choices of individuals but also how individuals consider alternatives, learn, adjust, and ultimately decide against certain options [27]. From the standpoint of causal inference, these datasets permit longitudinal analyses of infinitesimal period length and high-dimensional matching relying not only on a handful of sociodemographic variables but hundreds or thousands of individual and contextual attributes.…”
Section: Computational Tools As the Econometrics Of Sociologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is true that largescale and fine-grained data leave less room for researchers own interpretations of empirical findings, and that direct tests of the underlying causes of observed phenomena sometimes are possible [27], interpretations of causal effects and the transportability of results from one domain to another require that the type of generative mechanism is identified. If results cannot be traced back to general mechanisms, understanding remains incomplete and generalization beyond the specific case becomes hard to attain [5,67,68].…”
Section: Computational Tools As the Econometrics Of Sociologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In extant literature, this elimination process is labeled partitioning (Moorthy, Ratchford and Talukdar, 1997): Actors try to reduce the amount of information processing involved in complex decision making, adopting search and decision strategies that eliminate some of the available alternatives as quickly as possible, based on limited information (i.e. in reduced search space) (Bruch and Feinberg, 2017;Payne, 1976). While empirical evidence indicates that both embeddedness and proximity have a positive influence on tie formation (Balland, De Vaan, and Boschma, 2013), their complementarity and relative explanatory power are understudied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%