2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.12.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision-making's impact on organizational learning and information overload

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies were written about decision-making, but we find scarcity in the specialized papers that study the human side of the subject. We underline the importance to distinguish the nuances of decisionmaking in business -comprehensive faced to incremental approach, as recently described by Bettis-Outland [3]. The author proved that in the turbulent and competitive business environments the comprehensive decision-making is more successful than the incremental approach that works best in stable, predictable, less competitive business environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Many studies were written about decision-making, but we find scarcity in the specialized papers that study the human side of the subject. We underline the importance to distinguish the nuances of decisionmaking in business -comprehensive faced to incremental approach, as recently described by Bettis-Outland [3]. The author proved that in the turbulent and competitive business environments the comprehensive decision-making is more successful than the incremental approach that works best in stable, predictable, less competitive business environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The strategy is connected and interwoven in a continuous process by employees (Sharma & Kaur, 2009;Bettis-Outland, 2012;Elbanna, 2012;Sminia & Rond, 2013) and occurs by understanding the role that they (employees) should play in the management of strategy (Boswell, John, & Alexander, 2006). The various approaches and contemporanes strategic theories have a common factor in guiding employees in the strategy (Sharma & Kaur, 2009;Mintzberg et al, 2009;Sminia & Rond, 2013).…”
Section: Strategy Organization Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study presents an illustration of SOK in strategic socialisation processes among employees from the perspectives of comprehension which is the sense of purpose and main objective to be achieved (Sharma & Kaur, 2009;Elbanna, 2012), the employees participation in the deployment of strategic actions (Boswell et al, 2006;Khadem, 2008;Ouakouak & Ouedraogo, 2013), the influence of communication and integration of employee collaboration (Khadem, 2008;Beehr, Glazer, Fischer, Linton, & Hansen, 2009;Ugboro, Obeng, & Spann, 2011), and continuous learning organization (Nonaka & Toyama, 2005;Bettis-Outland, 2012).…”
Section: Strategy Organization Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The emphasis of human factors in these approaches means the decision makers (i.e., the project actors) are required to have both macro and micro level understanding of process evolutions in a real-time manner, before they can make any appropriate decisions. However, gaining such comprehensive understanding is not an easy task in practice, which could be prevented by certain issues that caused by the data accessibility, information overload or knowledge gap [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%