Decision-Making Under Uncertainty: Capturing Dynamic Brand Choice Processes in Turbulent Consumer Goods Markets

Abstract

We construct two models of the behavior of consumers in an environment where there is uncertainty about brand attributes. In our models, both usage experience and advertising exposure give consumers noisy signals about brand attributes. Consumers use these signals to update their expectations of brand attributes in a Bayesian manner. The two models are (1) a dynamic model with immediate utility maximization, and (2) a dynamic “forward-looking” model in which consumers maximize the expected present value of utility over a planning horizon. Given this theoretical framework, we derive from the Bayesian learning framework how brand choice probabilities depend on past usage experience and advertising exposures. We then form likelihood functions for the models and estimate them on Nielsen scanner data for detergent. We find that the functional forms for experience and advertising effects that we derive from the Bayesian learning framework fit the data very well relative to flexible ad hoc functional forms such as exponential smoothing, and also perform better at out-of-sample prediction. Another finding is that in the context of consumer learning of product attributes, although the forward-looking model fits the data statistically better at conventional significance levels, both models produce similar parameter estimates and policy implications. Our estimates indicate that consumers are risk-averse with respect to variation in brand attributes, which discourages them from buying unfamiliar brands. Using the estimated behavioral models, we perform various scenario evaluations to find how changes in marketing strategy affect brand choice both in the short and long run. A key finding obtained from the policy experiments is that advertising intensity has only weak short run effects, but a strong cumulative effect in the long run. The substantive content of the paper is potentially of interest to academics in marketing, economics and decision sciences, as well as product managers, marketing research managers and analysts interested in studying the effectiveness of marketing mix strategies. Our paper will be of particular interest to those interested in the long run effects of advertising. Note that our estimation strategy requires us to specify explicit behavioral models of consumer choice behavior, derive the implied relationships among choice probabilities, past purchases and marketing mix variables, and then estimate the behavioral parameters of each model. Such an estimation strategy is referred to as “structural” estimation, and econometric models that are based explicitly on the consumer's maximization problem and whose parameters are parameters of the consumers' utility functions or of their constraints are referred to as “structural” models. A key benefit of the structural approach is its potential usefulness for policy evaluation. The parameters of structural models are invariant to policy, that is, they do not change due to a change in the policy. In contrast, the parameters of reduced form brand choice models are...

Industry Specifics and Consumers’ Reactions to Business Crises

“…The crises, experienced by companies, may also be attributed to certain signals, affecting consumers' opinion of the products' quality. Erdem and Keane (1996) state that consumers face a certain level of uncertainty when evaluating quality and such uncertainty reduces with the increase of the amount of information, reaching the consumer. However, Zhao et al (2011) are of another opinion -when the information and signals are totally different from the previous ones, for instance, in a crisis situation, the level of uncertainty grows significantly and, in such case, the perception of quality may significantly change during a short period of time.…”

An Examination of Contemporary Celebrity Endorsement in Fashion

“…These effects are obviously magnified when considered in context of extremely competitive markets (Agrawal & Kamakura 1995;Barney 1995;Silvera & Austad 2004;Ghodeswar 2008), and product categories associated with concepts of style, status and seasonal new product development (Sheth 1995;Erdem & Keane 1996;Bush et al 2004;Carroll 2009). …”

Commentary—A Logit Model of Brand Choice Calibrated on Scanner Data: A 25th Anniversary Perspective

“…Variables are kept endogenous wherever possible. Erdem and Keane (1996) is a prize winning paper that has extended choice modeling in this direction.…”