Decision Support Capabilities of Telemedicine in Emergency Prehospital Care: Systematic Review

Abstract

Background Telemedicine offers a unique opportunity to improve coordination and administration for urgent patient care remotely. In an emergency setting, it has been used to support first responders by providing telephone or video consultation with specialists at hospitals and through the exchange of prehospital patient information. This technological solution is evolving rapidly, yet there is a concern that it is being implemented without a demonstrated clinical need and effectiveness as well as without a thorough economic evaluation. Objective Our objective is to systematically review whether the clinical outcomes achieved, as reported in the literature, favor telemedicine decision support for medical interventions during prehospital care. Methods This systematic review included peer-reviewed journal articles. Searches of 7 databases and relevant reviews were conducted. Eligibility criteria consisted of studies that covered telemedicine as data- and information-sharing and two-way teleconsultation platforms, with the objective of supporting medical decisions (eg, diagnosis, treatment, and receiving hospital decision) in a prehospital emergency setting. Simulation studies and studies that included pediatric populations were excluded. The procedures in this review followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement. The Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies–of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool was used for the assessment of risk of bias. The results were synthesized based on predefined aspects of medical decisions that are made in a prehospital setting, which include diagnostic decision support, receiving facility decisions, and medical directions for treatment. All data extractions were done by at least two reviewers independently. Results Out of 42 full-text reviews, 7 were found eligible. Diagnostic support and medical direction and decision for treatments were often reported. A key finding of this review was the high agreement between prehospital diagnoses via telemedicine and final in-hospital diagnoses, as supported by quantitative evidence. However, a majority of the articles described the clinical value of having access to remote experts without robust quantitative data. Most telemedicine solutions were evaluated within a feasibility or short-term preliminary study. In general, the results were positive for telemedicine use; however, biases, due to preintervention confounding factors and a lack of documentation on quality assurance and protocol for telemedicine activation, make it difficult to determine the direct effect on patient outcomes. Conclusions The information-sharing capacity of telemedicine enables access to remote experts to support medical decision making on scene or in prolonged field care. The influence of human and technology factors on patient care is poorly understood and documented.

Development and validation of a prehospital-stage prediction tool for traumatic brain injury: a multicentre retrospective cohort study in Korea

“…Although information acquisition and processing are quite difficult in prehospital areas, various instruments and information systems could attribute to diminish those problems. Complex data acquisition like mobile CT or other unstructured data, 41 information sharing through telemedicine 42 and decision support tools in prehospital environments 43 could contribute to the accurate assessment of EMS providers. More information acquisition and real-time processing of those data could improve the clinical prediction models in prehospital areas, which could lead to the improvement of patients’ safety and outcomes.…”

Telemedicine for emergency patients in pre-hospital care: A scoping review

“…31 In patients with stroke, myocardial infarction, septicemia, or pneumonia, time to effective therapy is a major determinant of prognosis. 32 Kim et al 29 found that remote expert consultation helped make accurate pre-hospital diagnoses using vital signs and image transfers. Vital signs are indicators of certain diseases such as infection, respiratory problems, and heart diseases.…”

Application of Smartphone Technologies in Disease Monitoring: A Systematic Review

“…Hence, we have considered studies evaluated in research settings and published exclusively in research journals. The final searches were based on the Embase search strategy ( Table S1 ), and searches were adapted as appropriate to the specifications of the databases [ 40 ].…”