Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Networks and Communication Technology (CNCT 2016) 2017
DOI: 10.2991/cnct-16.2017.83
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision Support Systems for Predicting Erectile Dysfunction

Abstract: Abstract. Men with ED generally complain failure to attain or maintain an adequate erection during sexual activity. The prevalence of ED is strongly correlated with age, affecting about 40% of men at age 40 and nearly 70% at aged 70. A variety of chronic diseases, including diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease (CVD), chronic renal failure, depression, sleep disorder, and gout were shown to be associated with ED. In this study, the data used for designing the clinical decision support system (CDSS) wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, we have conducted a prospective study to verify the effectiveness of a designed CDSS in ventilator weaning [ 19 ] and designed a predictive model for predicting erectile dysfunction using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database [ 86 ]. For predicting successful ventilator weaning, a predictive sensitivity of 87.7% has been achieved by using CDSS, which is significantly higher ( p < 0.01) than the weaning determined by physicians (sensitivity: 61.4%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, we have conducted a prospective study to verify the effectiveness of a designed CDSS in ventilator weaning [ 19 ] and designed a predictive model for predicting erectile dysfunction using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database [ 86 ]. For predicting successful ventilator weaning, a predictive sensitivity of 87.7% has been achieved by using CDSS, which is significantly higher ( p < 0.01) than the weaning determined by physicians (sensitivity: 61.4%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%