2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10098-020-01978-w
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision support tools for wind and solar farm site selection in Isfahan Province, Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A second benefit of classification in WiFSS studies is organizing one's analysis. Siting factors classified as environmental or technical often serve as constraints, such as limited development in protected wildlife areas [ 104 , 155 , 164 ], land that is too elevated or steep [ 79 , 140 , 142 ], or areas with insufficient wind speeds [ 123 , 139 , 178 ]. Similarly, economic siting factors like land leasing and maintenance costs are often incorporated into WiFSS models within a subset of equations that calculate cost competitiveness of candidate wind farm sites [ 122 , 165 , 177 , 200 , 214 ], hence their common classification.…”
Section: Results Fro M the Thematic Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A second benefit of classification in WiFSS studies is organizing one's analysis. Siting factors classified as environmental or technical often serve as constraints, such as limited development in protected wildlife areas [ 104 , 155 , 164 ], land that is too elevated or steep [ 79 , 140 , 142 ], or areas with insufficient wind speeds [ 123 , 139 , 178 ]. Similarly, economic siting factors like land leasing and maintenance costs are often incorporated into WiFSS models within a subset of equations that calculate cost competitiveness of candidate wind farm sites [ 122 , 165 , 177 , 200 , 214 ], hence their common classification.…”
Section: Results Fro M the Thematic Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acronyms for the listed MCDA methods: Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Analytic Network Process (ANP), Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), Multicriteria Optimization and Compromise Solution (VIKOR, in Bosnian), Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA), Best-Worst Method (BWM), ELimination Et Choice Translating REality (ELECTRE, in French), Preference Ranking Organization Method of Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE), Multicriteria Interactive Decision Making (TODIM, in Portuguese). MCDA Approach Study Context Data Type (Secondary/Primary) Weighting/Ranking Method References GIS-based Onshore Secondary AHP [ [46] , [74] , [75] , [78] , [79] , [80] , [82] , [83] , [94] , [104] , [122] , [123] , [124] , [125] , [126] , [127] , [128] , [129] , [130] , [131] , [132] , [133] , [134] , [135] , [136] , [137] , [138] , [139] , [140] , [141] , [142] , [143] , [144] , [145] , [146] , [147] , [148] ] ANP [ [149] , [150] , [151] ] …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, decision support tools have been increasingly used in the field of environmental management (Walling and Vaneeckhaute, 2020;Wong-Parodi et al, 2020;Barzehkar et al, 2021). One of the main reasons being the need for a framework to support the meaningful integration of multiple stakeholders in the decision-making process (Wong-Parodi et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their AHP results indicated wind speed and distance from power lines as the most important criteria. According to their final results, almost 15% of the total area had the most potential for wind farm sites, which are mainly located in the province's northeast [82].…”
Section: Comparison With Similar Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%