2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cll.2019.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision Support Tools within the Electronic Health Record

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Especially in the diagnostic field, algorithms to support medical decision making are rapidly growing, as they are fast, accurate and cheap. Decision support tools provide a welcome opportunity to lower the work pressure of physicians in an aging population with multimorbidity [14,15]. In several regions of the Netherlands, general practitioners are supported by specialists in laboratory medicine with a service called 'reflective testing' [7,16,17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially in the diagnostic field, algorithms to support medical decision making are rapidly growing, as they are fast, accurate and cheap. Decision support tools provide a welcome opportunity to lower the work pressure of physicians in an aging population with multimorbidity [14,15]. In several regions of the Netherlands, general practitioners are supported by specialists in laboratory medicine with a service called 'reflective testing' [7,16,17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ref. [ 2 ] claims that EHRs reduce pharmaceutical errors by giving medical practitioners decision-support tools including drug interaction alerts and dose suggestions. As they may be password-protected and encrypted, EHRs also offer a more secure access to patient data than conventional paper-based medical records, which lowers the risk of theft or unauthorized access.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computerized clinical decision support (CCDS) tools for laboratory results are frequently used and comprise flagging, messages and alerts on single test results among other appliances [3,4]. However, CCDS tools based on multiple factors for interpretation of laboratory results resulting in a clinical diagnosis are sparse [5,6], but some appliances are used [3,5]: Detection of drug-laboratory test interaction [7], test ordering guidance [4] and automatic interpretation of results [8]. Interpretive comments based on a combination of different laboratory results are sparsely developed [4,[7][8][9], and almost nonexisting for rare disease result interpretation [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on 965 workups investigated, we found that required interpretation time by the MD was reduced by 33% after introduction of the CCDS tool, from median (interquartile range) 6 (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11) to 4 (2-7) days. In August 2020, 25% of porphyria workups were performed with the CCDS tool, increasing to 66% in December 2020.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation