2020
DOI: 10.5951/mtlt.2020.0081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision Tree

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 shows the comparison of the precision, recall, and F1-score of the proposed approach using the most standard classification approaches (KNN [21], NB [22], SVM [23], DT [24], QDA [25], RF [26]). The QDA [25] based on Delaunay triangulation of landmark attains a promising precision as compared to other classifiers with 100% on CK+ database.…”
Section: Evaluation and Comparison Regarding Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Table 1 shows the comparison of the precision, recall, and F1-score of the proposed approach using the most standard classification approaches (KNN [21], NB [22], SVM [23], DT [24], QDA [25], RF [26]). The QDA [25] based on Delaunay triangulation of landmark attains a promising precision as compared to other classifiers with 100% on CK+ database.…”
Section: Evaluation and Comparison Regarding Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tables 8 shows a comparison of the similarity measures on CK+ Dataset for six classifiers. From that Table 8, it is noted that the value of similarity of QDA based on Delaunay triangulation is better than other classifiers (KNN [21], NB [22], SVM [23], DT [24], RF [26]). Such high similarity measure and low error indicated that the proposed Delaunay triangulation will achieve higher similarity values (100%) and is therefore suitable for facial expression recognition.…”
Section: Evaluation and Comparison Regarding Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations