Decision Tree versus k-NN: A Performance Comparison for Air Quality Classification in Indonesia

Abstract

Air quality can affect human health, the environment, and the sustainability of ecosystems, so efforts are needed to monitor and control air quality. The Plume Air Quality Index (PAQI) is one of the indices to measure and determine the level of air quality. In measuring the accuracy of the air quality level, it is necessary to do the right classification. Some previous studies have conducted classification analysis using the decision tree and K-Nearest Neighbor (k-NN) methods, but only evaluated using accuracy values. Therefore, this study uses both methods to evaluate the results of air quality level classification not only with accuracy but also with precision, recall, and F1-score. Secondary data of pollutant concentration values and PAQI categories based on particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and ozone (O3) derived from Plume Labs for 33 provincial capitals in Indonesia in the time period from July 1 to December 31, 2022, were used in this study. From the results of comparing the performance of the two methods, it is found that the decision tree has a greater performance value than the performance value of k-NN. The decision tree performance values for accuracy, precision, recall and F1-score are 90.67%, 90.61%, 90.67%, and 90.63%, respectively. So, it can be concluded that the decision tree performs better than k-NN in classifying PAQI categories with better overall evaluation metric values.

A Model-Agnostic Interpretability Approach to Predicting Customer Churn in the Telecommunications Industry

“…In recent years, machine learning has emerged as a powerful tool for predictive analytics, offering advanced techniques to analyze large datasets and uncover hidden patterns [9][10][11]. With their ability to process complex data and generate accurate predictions, machine learning models have been widely adopted across various domains, including customer churn prediction [12].…”