2008 12th Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops 2008
DOI: 10.1109/edocw.2008.28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Declarative Specification and Alignment Verification of Services in ITIL

Abstract: IT organizations that wish to implement the best practices recommended by the IT Infrastructure Library (ITIL) need to specify the level of service provided to their customers. The implemented service needs to comply with this specification. We propose a method for describing declarative specifications of services, and of their planned constructions. These specifications can then be used to verify the alignment between the specification and the construction. This method is based on first-order logic and on ref… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As other approaches, the previous work of Rychkova, [11] and [21], relies on manual mapping of SEAM constructs to Alloy 1 verifiable code, and requires service designers to know Alloy and interpret the result from the Alloy Analyzer tool. In contrast, our work relies on writing basic Scala arithmetic and logic operations in the SEAM model, but does not capture behavioral properties.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As other approaches, the previous work of Rychkova, [11] and [21], relies on manual mapping of SEAM constructs to Alloy 1 verifiable code, and requires service designers to know Alloy and interpret the result from the Alloy Analyzer tool. In contrast, our work relies on writing basic Scala arithmetic and logic operations in the SEAM model, but does not capture behavioral properties.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach focuses on properties that can be quantified, such as performance, latency, storage size, budget and maintenance time. This work extends the refinement and verification of behavior properties, expressed in terms of pre-and postconditions on actions [11]. A description of this extension is in [12] and in this paper we present advancements made in:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Refinement relationships are defined in Refinement Theory [19]. A formal semantics is defined for the behavior diagram [19] and is simulated using the Alloy specification tool [20].…”
Section: B Behavior Ontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SEAM has been applied for teaching [4] and consulting [5] since 2001. Prior applications of SEAM to service design have been published in [6] and [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%