2005
DOI: 10.4054/demres.2005.12.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decline in Human Cancer Incidence Rates at Old Ages: Age-Period-Cohort Considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed by Macunovich (1998) and based on my own literature survey, ageperiod-cohort analyses in demography have been implemented in a large amount of literature (Arbeev et al 2005;Brass 1974;Clayton and Schifflers 1987;Mason 1978, 1985;Foster 1990;Namboodiri 1981;Ni Bhrolchain 1992;Page 1977;Pullum 1980;Wilmoth 1990;Wright and Maxim 1987). The following three studies are noteworthy, but no existing study can be compared with my study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As discussed by Macunovich (1998) and based on my own literature survey, ageperiod-cohort analyses in demography have been implemented in a large amount of literature (Arbeev et al 2005;Brass 1974;Clayton and Schifflers 1987;Mason 1978, 1985;Foster 1990;Namboodiri 1981;Ni Bhrolchain 1992;Page 1977;Pullum 1980;Wilmoth 1990;Wright and Maxim 1987). The following three studies are noteworthy, but no existing study can be compared with my study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, the main problem with their method is that its methodological usefulness depends on strong prior information about the constraint, and estimates of model effect coefficients are sensitive to the arbitrary choice of the identifying constraint (Yang et al 2004). Recently, Arbeev et al (2005) applied a nonlinear age-period-cohort model developed by James and Segal (1982) to obtain declining U.S. cancer incidence rates at old ages. However, the age-period-cohort model proposed in this paper is a linear model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The model might also explain the decline in the incidence of cancer after the 8th decade of life [43] (see mathematic formulation in Supplementary Information). While very old persons have accumulated first-stage mutational hits at the stem cell level, because of their short telomeres, they are less likely to sustain through clonal expansion the 2 nd Hit.…”
Section: The Potential Resolution Of the Cancer-telomere Length Paradoxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] In contrast, immunity appears to decline with age and low-level chronic inflammation becomes commonplace. 7,8 Interestingly, however, cancer incidence rates begin to decelerate and plateau at age 85, 5 and rates of diagnosis of a number of cancers peak many years before. Incidence rates of testicular cancer, for example, are greatest between the ages of 25 and 35, falling thereafter, whilst male bowel cancer incidence rates fall throughout the ninth decade of life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%