Reduced habitat quality may be contributing to the decline of freshwater mussels in southeastern rivers. As part of an ongoing evaluation of the quality of freshwater mussel habitat in Gulf of Mexico coastal rivers, the Chipola River was assessed during 2006 and 2007. Sediment samples were collected at 8 sites along the Chipola River on May 2 and 3, 2006, and analyzed for contaminants and tested in the laboratory for toxicity to Hyalella azteca using 29 d exposures to solidphase sediment and 96 h exposures to sediment porewater. In addition, benthic macroinvertebrate populations were sampled at each site. Using the sediment quality triad approach (chemistry, toxicity and in situ benthic assemblages) to assess habitat quality, 3 sites (1, 4 and 8) were shown to be impaired, with Site 4 being the most impaired site. H. azteca survival in porewater exposures was reduced, and trace elements were elevated in sediments at these sites; however, concentrations were not considered exceedingly high. Water quality samples collected did not violate the State of Florida's water quality standards. The lack of concordance among the test metrics (in situ benthic assemblages were not impaired) at these sites suggests marginal habitat impairment.KEY WORDS: Water quality · Sediment quality · Macroinvertebrates · Chipola River · Freshwater mussels 6: 95-107, 2008 dence of causal mechanisms . Although causation has not been established, exposure to contaminants may have contributed to significant mussel losses (Newton 2003). Descriptions of localized mortality have been provided for chemical spills and other discrete point source discharges; however, range-wide decreases in mussel density and diversity may have resulted from the more insidious effects of chronic, low-level contamination (Naimo 1995, Newton 2003. As stated by Augspurger and others (2003), freshwater mussel experts often report chemical contaminants as factors that are limiting to unionids (Richter et al. 1997). They also noted the differential sensitivity of freshwater mussels that results in tolerances to some organic solvents and pesticides (Keller 1993, Keller & Ruessler 1997, but also high sensitivity of early life stages to contaminants such as chlorine (Goudreau et al. 1993), metals (Keller & Zam 1991, Jacobson et al. 1993, and ammonia (Horne & McIntosh 1979, Goudreau et al. 1993).
Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisher
OPEN PEN ACCESS CCESSEndang Species ResThere has recently been much progress in the area of mussel ecotoxicology ). There has been particular focus on the development and use of glochidia and juvenile mussel-specific toxicity tests (ASTM 2007, Wang et al. 2007a).Although not yet available when the present evaluation was designed and proposed, these mussel-specific tests have shown under which circumstances traditional surrogates are less sensitive to certain toxic exposures than some mussel life stages (Bringolf et al. 2007a,b,c, Newton & Bartsch 2007, Wang et al. 2007b,c, Gillis et al. 2008...