2022
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Declining temperature and increasing moisture sensitivity of shrub growth in the Low‐Arctic erect dwarf‐shrub tundra of western Greenland

Abstract: Evergreen dwarf shrubs respond swiftly to warming in the cool and dry High Arctic, but their response in the warmer Low Arctic, where they are expected to be outcompeted by taller species under future warming, remains to be clarified.Here, 12,528 annual growth increments, covering 122 years (1893-2014), were measured of 764 branches from 25 individuals of the evergreen dwarf shrub Cassiope tetragona from a Low-Arctic erect dwarf-shrub tundra site in western Greenland. In addition, branch initiation and mortali… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
(143 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result suggests that, given the strong oceanic imprint of Iceland climate (Einarsson, 2007), soil moisture should not be considered as a limiting factor in the area (Ackerman et al, 2017; Babst et al, 2010; Gamm et al, 2018). Moisture sensitivity of shrub species in the Arctic seems highly dependent on microclimatic and ‐topographic factors and this could be the reason why very often contrasting results are found (Myers‐Smith, Elmendorf, et al, 2015, Myers‐Smith, Hallinger, et al, 2015; Weijers, 2022). Therefore, further research is needed to disentangle the role and interactions of different drivers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result suggests that, given the strong oceanic imprint of Iceland climate (Einarsson, 2007), soil moisture should not be considered as a limiting factor in the area (Ackerman et al, 2017; Babst et al, 2010; Gamm et al, 2018). Moisture sensitivity of shrub species in the Arctic seems highly dependent on microclimatic and ‐topographic factors and this could be the reason why very often contrasting results are found (Myers‐Smith, Elmendorf, et al, 2015, Myers‐Smith, Hallinger, et al, 2015; Weijers, 2022). Therefore, further research is needed to disentangle the role and interactions of different drivers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the ongoing Arctic and low‐Arctic warming trends and future projections (IPCC, 2021), tundra shrub will also likely become less temperature‐limited and more moisture limited, especially if the warming is coupled with insufficient water availability (Weijers, 2022; Weijers et al, 2017). Recent investigations performed through direct growth measurements with dendrometers, highlighting a bimodal response to climate (Dobbert, Albrecht, et al, 2022; Dobbert, Pape, & Löffler, 2022), or adopting satellite‐derived vegetation indices (Myers‐Smith et al, 2020; Phoenix & Bjerke, 2016), seem to confirm this scenario.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ac.uk/groups-and-centres/climatic-research-unit, accessed on 5 March 2021), which had a monthly temporal resolution and a spatial resolution of 0.5 • . The CRU dataset was one of the most commonly used climate datasets at regional scales [32,33], which was obtained via a combination of in situ meteorological station observations with anomy processing, and modeling interpolation of angular distance weighting [34]. It was well correlated with meteorological station data from China Meteorological Data Network (https: //data.cma.cn/, accessed on 30 May 2022) in Anhui Province (correlation coefficients of 0.85-0.97 for temperature and 0.84-0.93 for precipitation, Figure 4).…”
Section: Climate Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim is to more accurately estimate the dynamics of shrubi cation in the Arctic tundra. One key factor limiting plant growth in the Arctic is the soil content of biogenic elements (Stimmler et al 2023), precipitation (Weijers 2022;Buras et al 2017) and temperature (Weijers et al 2017; Lehejček et al 2017). At the same time, soil temperature directly in uences the activity of soil microorganisms and the accessibility of mineral nutrients necessary for plant nutrition (Schmidt et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%