2012
DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/9/3/036015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decoding continuous three-dimensional hand trajectories from epidural electrocorticographic signals in Japanese macaques

Abstract: Brain–machine interface (BMI) technology captures brain signals to enable control of prosthetic or communication devices with the goal of assisting patients who have limited or no ability to perform voluntary movements. Decoding of inherent information in brain signals to interpret the user’s intention is one of main approaches for developing BMI technology. Subdural electrocorticography (sECoG)-based decoding provides good accuracy, but surgical complications are one of the major concerns for this approach to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
151
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
4
151
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, they could provide an even safer alternative to ECoG while still allowing accurate control of movement (Rouse et al, 2013;Shimoda et al, 2012;Slutzky et al, 2011). Together, these intermediate signal sources could provide clinicians with an important signal source for BMI applications.…”
Section: Implications For Bmismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, they could provide an even safer alternative to ECoG while still allowing accurate control of movement (Rouse et al, 2013;Shimoda et al, 2012;Slutzky et al, 2011). Together, these intermediate signal sources could provide clinicians with an important signal source for BMI applications.…”
Section: Implications For Bmismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This potentially mitigates some inflammatory burden on the brain. ECoG signals have been found to encode information about arm and hand movements (Leuthardt et al, 2004; Schalk et al, 2007; Crone et al, 1998; Miller et al, 2007; Pistohl et al, 2008; Wang et al, 2009; Kubánek et al, 2009; Ball et al, 2009; Miller et al, 2009; Chao et al, 2010; Acharya et al, 2010; Degenhart et al, 2011a; Shimoda et al, 2012; Chestek et al, 2013; Nakanishi et al, 2013), as well as auditory (Edwards et al, 2005; Trautner et al, 2006), visual (Lachaux et al, 2005), language (Crone et al, 2001; Mainy et al, 2007; Kellis et al, 2010; Wang et al; 2011, Pei et al, 2011), and attentional processes (Tallon-Baudry et al, 2005; Jung et al, 2008; Ray et al, 2008). Encouraged by these findings, researchers have begun to investigate ECoG as a potential source of control signals for BMI devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, ECoG has gained attention as a tool for electrophysiological research in animals because it offers several advantages, including large spatial coverage, fine spatiotemporal resolution, and stable recordings over weeks to months, which are impossible to attain simultaneously with other recording techniques (Bosman et al, 2012;Chao et al, 2010;Matsuo et al, 2011;Rubehn et al, 2009;Shimoda et al, 2012;Viventi et al, 2011). These advantages make ECoG a promising technique for neuroengineering applications, including brain machine interfaces (Graimann et al, 2004;Schalk et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%