Decoding Laboratory Test Names: A Major Challenge to Appropriate Patient Care

Abstract

Clinical laboratory tests have no value if clinicians cannot quickly order and obtain the results they need. We found that efforts to obtain even the most commonly ordered tests are often derailed by excessively complex nomenclature. Ordering the right laboratory tests is critical to diagnosis and treatment, but existing mechanisms for entering lab orders actively interfere with physicians' efforts to provide good clinical care. Rather than simplifying lab orders, the advent of computerized physician order entry (CPOE) systems-generally programmed by non-clinicians-has introduced new and vexing practical problems. Medical laboratories have filled their test menus, whether paper or electronic, with bewildering nomenclature and abbreviations, and have failed to appreciate the dangers of assigning perilously similar names to different tests. The efficient and efficacious patient care demanded by the quality care initiative requires progress beyond traditional solutions, such as convening naming conventions, to the development of innovative software with intelligent, real-time, clinically driven search functions that will allow these programs to help rather than hinder physicians.

Confidential genetic testing and electronic health records: A survey of current practices among Huntington disease testing centers

“…Clinical laboratory test ordering needs to be clear and concise to avoid mistakes between the care team and laboratory interface. In many cases in the medical field, the test names are overly complex and full of abbreviations leading to confusion (Passiment et al, 2013); however, this survey shows the opposite may have the same effect. One institution uses the term "Genetic Analysis," which is a specific "unwritten code" for HD testing at that laboratory.…”

Diagnostic Stewardship as a Team Sport: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Improved Implementation of Interventions and Effect Measurement

“…Therefore, special consideration should be given to how the test is named and what information accompanies the orderable in the system. Test naming conventions have demonstrated significant appropriate utilization challenges [ 24 , 25 , 26 ]. Recently, the initiative Test Renaming for Understanding and Utilization for Laboratory Test Names (TRUU-Lab) has begun and represents a concerted effort with participation across industry and government agencies to address this challenge [ 27 ].…”

Practical data collection and extraction for big data applications in radiotherapy

“…15 HL7, however, does not define naming standards, so incoming data from different laboratory sources are likely to have different naming. Although these data are well suited for analysis, there remain difficulties in adherence to standard nomenclature 16 and units such as those defined by LOINC and SNOWMED creating translational problems when data are aggregated.…”