2014 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging 2014
DOI: 10.1109/prni.2014.6858510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decoding perceptual thresholds from MEG/EEG

Abstract: Abstract-Magnetoencephalography (MEG) can map brain activity by recording the electromagnetic fields generated by the electrical currents in the brain during a perceptual or cognitive task. This technique offers a very high temporal resolution that allows noninvasive brain exploration at a millisecond (ms) time scale. Decoding, a.k.a. brain reading, consists in predicting from neuroimaging data the subject's behavior and/or the parameters of the perceived stimuli. This is facilitated by the use of supervised l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We argue that this evaluation metric is better suited than a regression loss for this task because of the discrete and ordered nature of the labels. Also, this loss is less sensible to shrinkage of the prediction that might occur when penalizing a regression model (Bekhti et al, 2014). The Kendall tau coefficient always lies within the interval [−1, 1], with 1 being perfect agreement between the two rankings and −1 perfect disagreement.…”
Section: Dataset 2: Decoding Of Potential Gain Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We argue that this evaluation metric is better suited than a regression loss for this task because of the discrete and ordered nature of the labels. Also, this loss is less sensible to shrinkage of the prediction that might occur when penalizing a regression model (Bekhti et al, 2014). The Kendall tau coefficient always lies within the interval [−1, 1], with 1 being perfect agreement between the two rankings and −1 perfect disagreement.…”
Section: Dataset 2: Decoding Of Potential Gain Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%