Decoding the data dichotomy: applying QuantCrit to understand racially conscience intersectional meta-analytic research

Young, Jamaal; Young, Jemimah L.

doi:10.1080/1743727x.2022.2093847

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For this reason, race and college generation status were examined separately to avoid hiding the effects of racism that are conflated with college generation status (Rondini, 2023;Street et al, 2022). In the interest of research transparency, which is a recommendation of QuantCrit (Young & Young, 2022), the survey instrument and de-identified data from this study are openly available on Open Science Framework (Authors, 2023).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Online Homework Systems Survey

Clinton-Lisell,

Kelly

2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The use of online homework systems that require purchase of an access code has become widespread. The purpose of this study is to examine student experiences with and perceptions of online homework systems with access codes. Postsecondary students (N = 966) completed a survey about the financial costs, perceptions of quality, engagement with, and learning with online homework systems. Most students (79.5%) indicated that they had been required to purchase an access code for an online homework system. Of those who had been required to purchase an access code, 29.4% reported their grade was hurt because they could not afford an access code. Students reported online homework systems were moderately helpful for learning. When considering students who have been historically underserved by higher education, Black students reported more courses with required access codes for homework and reported that online homework systems were more helpful than other students. Latino/a/x students were more likely to report their grades were hurt by not affording access codes (47.9%) than other students. First-generation students reported they avoided courses with online homework systems (36.9%) than continuing-generation students (23.9%). Overall, the findings indicate that the cost of online homework systems is a barrier to education, and alternatives should be further developed and promoted.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Online Homework Systems Survey

Clinton-Lisell,

Kelly

2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This is practiced through data analysis that mindfully considers race and other socially constructed groups of peoples historically marginalized by society (Castillo & Gillborn, 2022;Crawford, 2019). Moreover, limitations of research findings for those who have been historically underserved by educational systems must be acknowledged explicitly (Young & Young, 2022). Open education research data and materials should be available whenever possible for others to consider through their own analyses and interpretations (Grahe et al, 2020;Young & Young, 2022).…”

Section: Future Inquiry Needed Across the Scope Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Moreover, limitations of research findings for those who have been historically underserved by educational systems must be acknowledged explicitly (Young & Young, 2022). Open education research data and materials should be available whenever possible for others to consider through their own analyses and interpretations (Grahe et al, 2020;Young & Young, 2022). This need for research transparency coincides with the open scholarship and science movements.…”

Section: Future Inquiry Needed Across the Scope Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

SCOPE of Open Education: A New Framework for Research

Clinton-Lisell,

Roberts-Crews,

Gwozdz

2023

IRRODL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The field of open education and research on the topic has notably expanded since the introduction of the term 20 years ago. Given these developments, a framework to structure research inquiry is necessary to ground and organize findings in open education. We propose the SCOPE framework for open education research: social justice, cost, outcomes, perceptions, and engagement. In this article, we explain how this framework emphasizes the need for social justice at the forefront of open education research. In addition, we incorporate existing theories in social justice, motivation, cognition, pedagogy, and engagement into each of the components to propose theoretical connections to future open education research. We suggest areas in which future research is needed. Finally, we conclude with suggestions as to how the SCOPE framework may be useful when connecting open education to open science and open scholarship as well as a call for considering intersectionality and critical methods in quantitative research (QuantCrit) in future inquiry.

show abstract

Dreaming of disability‐as‐possibility as a humanistic STEM education futurity

Boda

2024

Science Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

I Dream with and through a positionality that lacks critical theorizing in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education research: Students labeled with disabilities; Disability beyond students’ accommodations. Understanding this marginalized population can push humanistic STEM scholarship to disrupt ableism by design, thereby honoring students’ voices, identities, and Dreams as knowledge‐building sources. Engaging purposefully along such a proactive centering of these margins pushes STEM researchers to think beyond past challenges and break away from the free‐market value commoditizations of education. I urge we Dream future possibilities of humanistic STEM education where researchers, teachers, and students are aligned to build new cultures of joy and feelings of relational belonging. In this way I seek to nurture the brilliance of students who are historically marginalized, including Disabled people, because of a desire to define their studenthood on their own terms. I argue that STEM education researchers working toward “what if” leveraging intersectionality as a way to critically theorize design can do more than change disciplinary practices: We can help students to Dream beyond “what is.”

show abstract

Decoding the data dichotomy: applying QuantCrit to understand racially conscience intersectional meta-analytic research

Cited by 5 publications

References 26 publications

Online Homework Systems Survey

Online Homework Systems Survey

SCOPE of Open Education: A New Framework for Research

Dreaming of disability‐as‐possibility as a humanistic STEM education futurity

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About