2006
DOI: 10.1101/gr.4247306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decoding the fine-scale structure of a breast cancer genome and transcriptome

Abstract: A comprehensive understanding of cancer is predicated upon knowledge of the structure of malignant genomes underlying its many variant forms and the molecular mechanisms giving rise to them. It is well established that solid tumor genomes accumulate a large number of genome rearrangements during tumorigenesis. End Sequence Profiling (ESP) maps and clones genome breakpoints associated with all types of genome rearrangements elucidating the structural organization of tumor genomes. Here we extend the ESP methodo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
76
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(64 reference statements)
6
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gray presented a list of technologies for assessing DNA and genomic defects, and related them in a matrix to the biological endpoints that could potentially be measured or analyzed with those technologies, and their detection capabilities (Table II). The technologies evaluated included PCR-based sequencing, PCR-based conformation analysis, sequencing by hybridization, ESP [Volik et al, 2003[Volik et al, ,2006, high-throughput sequencing, primer extension, FISH, CGH, high-throughput LOH, optical mapping, genome subtraction, expression arrays [Wang et al, 2005], Serial Analysis Gene Expression (SAGE, both RNA, and DNA), chromatin immunoprecipitation assays, protein lysate arrays, 1D and 2D gel electrophoresis, mass spectrometry, and computational biology. Many of the advantages and limitations of these technologies were presented by earlier speakers.…”
Section: Open Discussion Sessionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gray presented a list of technologies for assessing DNA and genomic defects, and related them in a matrix to the biological endpoints that could potentially be measured or analyzed with those technologies, and their detection capabilities (Table II). The technologies evaluated included PCR-based sequencing, PCR-based conformation analysis, sequencing by hybridization, ESP [Volik et al, 2003[Volik et al, ,2006, high-throughput sequencing, primer extension, FISH, CGH, high-throughput LOH, optical mapping, genome subtraction, expression arrays [Wang et al, 2005], Serial Analysis Gene Expression (SAGE, both RNA, and DNA), chromatin immunoprecipitation assays, protein lysate arrays, 1D and 2D gel electrophoresis, mass spectrometry, and computational biology. Many of the advantages and limitations of these technologies were presented by earlier speakers.…”
Section: Open Discussion Sessionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Colin Collins (UC, San Francisco) noted that ESP is a relatively new technology that can clone and map many kinds of chromosomal defects, e.g., deletions, insertions, translocations, inversions, and copy number changes, in a single step [Volik et al, 2006]. The resolution of ESP is relatively high (10 kb), and this powerful technology could be useful for identifying and characterizing environmentally induced germ-cell mutations.…”
Section: Open Discussion Sessionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further analyses using tiling-path array comparative genomic hybridization on many cases should determine whether distinct 20q13 amplicons can be recurrently identified in type 2 tumors. The region may also be ''packaged'' in a single amplicon as to contain only amplified and overexpressed selected genes (43,44). The participation of Aurora A in type 2 amplification is highly suspected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chromosomal aberration is a sentinel feature of many cancers, and the associated gene deregulation and genome instability is implicated in the development and progression of prostate cancer (5,6,(28)(29)(30). Combined genome copy-number analysis of each independent transplantable tumor line Table 1.…”
Section: Conservation Of Patient Tumor Molecular Characteristics and mentioning
confidence: 99%