2013
DOI: 10.1021/jp401005v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decoherence Cross-Section in NO + Ar Collisions: Experimental Results and a Simple Model

Abstract: Quantum decoherence can be viewed as the mechanism responsible for the quantum-to-classical transition as the initially prepared quantum state interacts with its environment in an irreversible manner. One of the most common mechanisms responsible for the macroscopically observed decoherence involves collisions of an atom or molecule, initially prepared in a coherent superposition of states, with gas particles. In this work, a coherent superposition of quantum internal states of NO molecules is prepared by the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ureña and coworkers measured an unexpectedly large NO decoherence cross‐section with Ar collision while preparing the coherent NO molecular beam. They used radio frequency (RF) and a static DC field for producing the coherent NO beam and measured the visibility V of the coherent NO beam intensity as a function of Ar gas pressure in the scattering cell . The visibility is defined by Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ureña and coworkers measured an unexpectedly large NO decoherence cross‐section with Ar collision while preparing the coherent NO molecular beam. They used radio frequency (RF) and a static DC field for producing the coherent NO beam and measured the visibility V of the coherent NO beam intensity as a function of Ar gas pressure in the scattering cell . The visibility is defined by Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in the next section.) Thus, quantum decoherence cross‐section becomes observable . A comparison was made between the decoherence collision cross‐section ( σ d = 2.58 × 10 3 Å 2 ) and its attenuation cross‐section ( σ att = 230 Å 2 ), and an unexpectedly large difference between the two cross‐sections was found, as schematically shown in Figure .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation