“…Concerns about the exclusion of diverse knowledges have emerged as a pervasive feature of contemporary criminological thought. This is reflected in the emergence of a major body of thought focused on shifting thinking and developments emanating from the 'Global South', from the 'periphery' and the 'semi-periphery' (Lee & Laidler, 2013;Medina, 2011;Moosavi, 2019), to the centre of the criminological stage. These have included: a 'counter-colonial criminology' (Agozino, 2003(Agozino, , 2020Kitossa, 2012); a 'neo-colonial' criminology (Deckert, 2014); an 'indigenous' criminology (Cunneen & Tauri, 2016;Tauri, 2017); a 'southern' criminology and a 'green southern' criminology (Carrington et al, 2016, 2018, Carrington, Dixon et al, 2019Carrington, Hogg et al, 2019;Goyes, 2019); a 'postcolonial' criminology (Cunneen, 2011;Medina, 2011); along with more regionally-based criminologies, such as Asian (Lee & Laidler, 2013;Liu, 2009, Liu et al, 2013, African (Alemika, 2020;Chukwuma, 2011;Dixon, 2001Dixon, , 2004Ebbe, 2011;van Zyl Smit, 1999), Latin American (Del Olmo, 1999;Escobar, 2011;Heskia, 2011;Juarez & Solares, 2011;Rodrigues, 2011;Schulte-Bockholt, 2012) as well as a criminology of the Arab world (Ouassini & Ouassini, 2020).…”