2016
DOI: 10.3390/h5010007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decolonization of Trauma and Memory Politics: Insights from Eastern Europe

Abstract: The movement to decolonize trauma theory conceptualizes traumas as rooted in particular contexts. Scholars working within this framework caution against the monumentalism of traumas as singular events and press for the acknowledgment of traumas experienced by minorities and liminal groups. In addition, this body of literature suggests a question of fundamental significance to memory politics: How to make sure that postcolonial attempts to memorialize the traumatic histories of colonialism do not become sources… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within Ukraine, the topic of subjective poverty is often discussed in terms of nostalgia for socialism (Symonchuk, 2003;Zlobina, 2004) or as part of the Ukrainian performative identity constructed around the notions of victimhood and oppression (Moore, 2012;Budryte, 2016). These explanations of subjective poverty lead to pervasively exclusionary welfare politics which direct the attention away from the issues surrounding pensions, social insurance and labour policies, and instead stigmatise the most disadvantaged groups (Kovács, Polese and Morris, 2017).…”
Section: Subjective Poverty In Post-socialist Countriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Within Ukraine, the topic of subjective poverty is often discussed in terms of nostalgia for socialism (Symonchuk, 2003;Zlobina, 2004) or as part of the Ukrainian performative identity constructed around the notions of victimhood and oppression (Moore, 2012;Budryte, 2016). These explanations of subjective poverty lead to pervasively exclusionary welfare politics which direct the attention away from the issues surrounding pensions, social insurance and labour policies, and instead stigmatise the most disadvantaged groups (Kovács, Polese and Morris, 2017).…”
Section: Subjective Poverty In Post-socialist Countriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imperialism is discussed mostly in reference to Soviet times and repression of Ukrainians by Russians (Doyle, 1986;Kuzio, 2002;Barrington, 2009;Szeptycki, 2011;Applebaum, 2017). Lack of scholarly exploration of internalised inferiority to Western Europe could be due to resistance amongst intellectuals of lumping postcommunist countries with the rest of the developing world (Budryte, 2016). At most, the comparison to Western Europe is discussed as the idealisation of the West before the fall of the Soviet Union (Yurchak, 2005) and disappointment with the outcomes of the transition (Loveless, 2013;Aleksievich and Shayevich, 2016).…”
Section: Misrecognition and Self-respectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This "other" Europe could easily be described as a "region of memory" (Olick, 2016) that emerged as a "backlash against a Soviet-imposed memory" (Frȍhling, 2020: 23). Despite differences among their cultural and historical traditions and the direct impact of the Western project of European integration, these countries share the characteristics of a post-colonial and obsessively post-catastrophic space (Budryte, 2016;Mink and Neumayer, 2013: 1-22;Törnquist-Plewa, 2021: 15-17).…”
Section: Some Conclusion On Historical Trauma and Memory Warsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even when ‘trauma work’ is undertaken and a trauma process is very much under way, the deadlocks it confronts and drawbacks it presents are more complex than previous West-centric case studies have allowed us to appreciate. Thus, a decolonial approach to trauma theory can evade the ‘monumentalism of traumas’ (Budryte, 2016), expanding the range of cultural trauma processes that are recognised as such beyond the usual modes of public remembrance, apologies, memorialisation, and other institutionalised practices. Instead, it would measure the degree to which the traumatic events are imprinted on the consciousness of ordinary people, communities, and collective identities, regardless of how hopeful they might be about reparations.…”
Section: Unproductive Compassion and The Right To Meaningmentioning
confidence: 99%