Decolonizing Pathways to Sustainability: Lessons Learned from Three Inuit Communities in NunatuKavut, Canada

Abstract

Community led planning is necessary for Inuit to self-determine on their lands and to ensure the preservation of cultural landscapes and the sustainability of social-ecological systems that they are a part of. The sustainability efforts of three Inuit communities in Labrador during a Community Governance and Sustainability Initiative were guided by a decolonized and strength-based planning framework, including the values of Inuit in this study. This paper demonstrates that Inuit led planning efforts can strengthen community sustainability planning interests and potential. We situate the experiences of NunatuKavut Inuit within, and contribute to, the existing body of scholarly decolonization and sustainability literature. For many Indigenous people, including Inuit, decolonization is connected to inherent rights to self-determination. The findings suggest that decolonizing efforts must be understood and actualized within an Indigenous led research and sustainability planning paradigm that facilitates autonomous decision making and that is place based. Further, this study illustrates five predominant results regarding Inuit in planning for community sustainability that support sustainable self-determination. These include: inter and cross community sharing; identification of community strengths; strengthened community capacity; re-connection to community and culture; and the possibility for identification of sustainability goals to begin implementation through community led governance and planning processes.

The Need to Articulate Historic and Cultural Dimensions of Landscapes in Sustainable Environmental Planning—A Swedish Case Study

“…Furthermore, lack of methodologies to include local communities other than through formal consultation in the planning process makes the intangible and socio-culturally perspectives on landscape less dominant, which is the norm in the Swedish context [20,60]. This is in line with previous research highlighting the need for local participation in order to manage cultural landscapes [7,[61][62][63]. Other challenges identified in the present study are unclear assignments and lack of political policy as well as unawareness and disinterest among politicians, developers and the public.…”

Is There a Place for Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities in Climate Change Policy and Governance? Learnings from a Brazilian Case

“…The need for recognition of the role played by Traditional Peoples and Communities also has implications for land use. When reflecting on the objectives for designating an area to be protected and in light of the growing recognition of the contributions of traditional knowledge to biodiversity [9,66,67], a harmonious relationship between the traditional community and protected area management was expected. However, in the case studied, this relationship is divided into two historical moments, a conflictive past, marked by actions defined as repressive and authoritarian, and a present that seeks to build a space for dialogue.…”

Ten years of Inuit co-management: advancing research, resilience, and capacity in Nunatsiavut through fishery governance

“…Inuit communities have found success undertaking planning initiatives that focus on co-learning, mutual support, and sharing (Patrick et al 2019;Riedlsperger et al 2017). Creating a space that encourages equitable sharing and discussion can create solidarity among actors and removes some of the competition from relationships (Hudson and Vodden 2020). Actively encouraging fishers to communicate about their needs and priorities should be done in ways that are culturally relevant and place-based, and so, rather than sacrificing the efficiency of the Annual Fisheries Workshop, new initiatives should be set up to facilitate co-learning and active feedback.…”