2012 IEEE Colloquium on Humanities, Science and Engineering (CHUSER) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/chuser.2012.6504275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decommissioning of offshore platform: A sustainable framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Decommissioning regulations and options in various countries and regions have been reported on and assessed extensively in the literature. While decommissioning in the North Sea and the United States (US) has been well studied (e.g., Reggio, 1987;Löfstedt and Renn, 1997;Dauterive, 2000;Cripps and Aabel, 2002;Schroeder and Love, 2004;Kaiser and Pulsipher, 2005;Jørgensen, 2012;Claisse et al, 2015), there has been more recent focus on decommissioning policy in relatively "new" oil and gas producing regions, such as south-east Asia (Zawawi et al, 2012;Al-Ghuribi et al, 2016;Fam et al, 2018;Laister and Jagerroos, 2018), Australia (Fowler et al, 2015;Techera and Chandler, 2015;Chandler et al, 2017), and Brazil (Barros et al, 2017;Mimmi et al, 2017). Two recent reviews (Bull and Love, 2019;Sommer et al, 2019) provide comprehensive assessments of the literature on the decommissioning process, options, and regulations around the world.…”
Section: Decommissioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decommissioning regulations and options in various countries and regions have been reported on and assessed extensively in the literature. While decommissioning in the North Sea and the United States (US) has been well studied (e.g., Reggio, 1987;Löfstedt and Renn, 1997;Dauterive, 2000;Cripps and Aabel, 2002;Schroeder and Love, 2004;Kaiser and Pulsipher, 2005;Jørgensen, 2012;Claisse et al, 2015), there has been more recent focus on decommissioning policy in relatively "new" oil and gas producing regions, such as south-east Asia (Zawawi et al, 2012;Al-Ghuribi et al, 2016;Fam et al, 2018;Laister and Jagerroos, 2018), Australia (Fowler et al, 2015;Techera and Chandler, 2015;Chandler et al, 2017), and Brazil (Barros et al, 2017;Mimmi et al, 2017). Two recent reviews (Bull and Love, 2019;Sommer et al, 2019) provide comprehensive assessments of the literature on the decommissioning process, options, and regulations around the world.…”
Section: Decommissioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the systematic literature review, all potential OOGP decommissioning options are divided into three categories: reuse, recycling, and disposal. Usually, reuse has the top priority considering the sustainability as its energy consumption is relatively small compared to recycling (Zawawi et al 2012) and more environmentally friendly than disposal. An OOGP can choose one decommissioning option for the whole structure.…”
Section: Summarized Potential Oogp Decommissioning Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An OOGP can choose one decommissioning option for the whole structure. For example, the platform can be transferred to a Liquid Natural Gas (LNG) terminal or an offshore hotel (Zawawi et al 2012). In addition, different decommissioning options can also be applied to the different parts of an OOGP.…”
Section: Summarized Potential Oogp Decommissioning Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The RTR concept began as early as 1975, when in the South China Sea (Malaysia) the storm-damaged Baram-8 platform was toppled to form the base of an artificial reef (Zawawi et al, 2012). Since then, RTR schemes have been legislated only in Brunei's sector of the South China Sea (Twomey, 2012), and in the United States' (US) Gulf of Mexico (GoM) in Louisiana and Texas, and in Pacific California (Jørgensen, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%