2010
DOI: 10.1017/s0305004110000368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decomposing locally compact groups into simple pieces

Abstract: Abstract. We present a contribution to the structure theory of locally compact groups. The emphasis is on compactly generated locally compact groups which admit no infinite discrete quotient. It is shown that such a group possesses a characteristic cocompact subgroup which is either connected or admits a non-compact non-discrete topologically simple quotient. We also provide a description of characteristically simple groups and of groups all of whose proper quotients are compact. We show that Noetherian locall… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
97
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
97
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The group G is then a t.d.l.c.s.c. group, and via [, Proposition 4.3], G is regionally SIN. Lemma now ensures that ξ(G)2.…”
Section: Elementary Groups and The Decomposition Rankmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The group G is then a t.d.l.c.s.c. group, and via [, Proposition 4.3], G is regionally SIN. Lemma now ensures that ξ(G)2.…”
Section: Elementary Groups and The Decomposition Rankmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More subtly still, a residually discrete t.d.l.c.s.c. group may be written as a countable increasing union of small invariant neighbourhood (SIN) groups by results of Caprace and Monod [7]. t.d.l.c.s.c.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let G be a compactly generated totally disconnected locally compact group without non-trivial compact or discrete normal subgroup. Then: (i) every non-trivial closed normal subgroup contains a minimal one; (ii) the set M of non-trivial minimal closed normal subgroups need not be finite, but the subset M na of its non-abelian elements is finite; (iii) each abelian M ∈ M is topologically locally finite, hence contained in RadAssertions (i) and (iv) are stated and correctly proved in [1]. The erroneous assertion in loc.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…(Received 9 February 2015; revised 7 August 2017) Phillip Wesolek (personal communication) pointed out an error in Proposition 2·6 from our paper [1]; we thank him for his perspicacious remark, as well as for helpful comments on an earlier version of this correction. That error is corrected below; as we shall see, it only affects the statements of Theorem B and Proposition 2·6.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%