Decomposing Multifractal Crossovers

Abstract

Physiological processes—such as, the brain's resting-state electrical activity or hemodynamic fluctuations—exhibit scale-free temporal structuring. However, impacts common in biological systems such as, noise, multiple signal generators, or filtering by transport function, result in multimodal scaling that cannot be reliably assessed by standard analytical tools that assume unimodal scaling. Here, we present two methods to identify breakpoints or crossovers in multimodal multifractal scaling functions. These methods incorporate the robust iterative fitting approach of the focus-based multifractal formalism (FMF). The first approach (moment-wise scaling range adaptivity) allows for a breakpoint-based adaptive treatment that analyzes segregated scale-invariant ranges. The second method (scaling function decomposition method, SFD) is a crossover-based design aimed at decomposing signal constituents from multimodal scaling functions resulting from signal addition or co-sampling, such as, contamination by uncorrelated fractals. We demonstrated that these methods could handle multimodal, mono- or multifractal, and exact or empirical signals alike. Their precision was numerically characterized on ideal signals, and a robust performance was demonstrated on exemplary empirical signals capturing resting-state brain dynamics by near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), electroencephalography (EEG), and blood oxygen level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI-BOLD). The NIRS and fMRI-BOLD low-frequency fluctuations were dominated by a multifractal component over an underlying biologically relevant random noise, thus forming a bimodal signal. The crossover between the EEG signal components was found at the boundary between the δ and θ bands, suggesting an independent generator for the multifractal δ rhythm. The robust implementation of the SFD method should be regarded as essential in the seamless processing of large volumes of bimodal fMRI-BOLD imaging data for the topology of multifractal metrics free of the masking effect of the underlying random noise.

Frequency-Specific Fractal Analysis of Postural Control Accounts for Control Strategies

“…AFA could benefit from a similar frequency interpretation. We can also imagine a frequency-specific multifractal analysis, which could for instance be a direct extension of FsFA by using multi-fractal DFA (Kantelhardt et al, 2002 ; Matic et al, 2015 ), or an indirect extension using multifractal crossovers (Nagy et al, 2017 ). Future research may focus on developing and testing the efficiently of such tools.…”

Day and Night Changes of Cardiovascular Complexity: A Multi-Fractal Multi-Scale Analysis

“…For this reason, the interest in methods that quantify self-similar (or fractal) properties of the cardiovascular dynamics is increasing. A very popular method is based on the detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA), which provides a self-similarity scale coefficient, α, directly related to the Hurst's exponent [2]. When DFA was originally proposed for the analysis of heart rate variability, it described a bi-scale fractal model providing a short-term coefficient (α 1 ) for scales shorter than 16 beats and a long-term coefficient (α 2 ) for longer scales [3].…”

Systems Medicine Disease: Disease Classification and Scalability Beyond Networks and Boundary Conditions

“…These difficulties are emphasized by Moorman and Ivanov in their discussion of the early detection of sepsis (widespread infection through the body resulting in organ system dysfunction) (Moorman et al, 2016 ). They, as do other researchers, refer to physicists who long ago learned that integrated functions at the system level cannot be simply expressed as the sum of individual subsystems and their behaviors (Morrison and Newell, 2012 ; Green, 2013 ; Pantziarka, 2016 ; Batterman, 2017 ; Goulev et al, 2017 ; Nagy et al, 2017 ).…”