Plant Litter 2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-59631-6_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decomposition as a Process—some Main Features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, it was observed that there was a significantly negative correlation between litter decomposition and soil respiration in both week 3 (R = −0.41, p < 0.001) and week 6 (R = −0.47, p < 0.001), which is in line with the previous study [21]. The litter decomposition lead to two processes, i.e., CO2 release and the leaching of C-and N-containing compounds [40]. Organic materials, as a crucial carbon source in the microcosm, significantly increased soil respiration in terms of CO2 production.…”
Section: Soil Respirationsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, it was observed that there was a significantly negative correlation between litter decomposition and soil respiration in both week 3 (R = −0.41, p < 0.001) and week 6 (R = −0.47, p < 0.001), which is in line with the previous study [21]. The litter decomposition lead to two processes, i.e., CO2 release and the leaching of C-and N-containing compounds [40]. Organic materials, as a crucial carbon source in the microcosm, significantly increased soil respiration in terms of CO2 production.…”
Section: Soil Respirationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The litter bag containing hemp stem significantly increased the proportion of water-stable aggregates in spite of the PFBS concentration (p < 0.05), with an effect size of 11.3% (95% CI: 7.65%-14.8%) (Figure 3b). However, the soil The litter decomposition lead to two processes, i.e., CO 2 release and the leaching of C-and N-containing compounds [40]. Organic materials, as a crucial carbon source in the microcosm, significantly increased soil respiration in terms of CO 2 production.…”
Section: Soil Water-stable Aggregatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chemical character and biological reactivity of DOM inputs from organic horizons also differed between forest types (Table S1, Figure 4). While the old‐growth had more recalcitrant DOM inputs, the more reactive DOM compounds of the second‐growth inputs (Figures 3(c) and 4) and associated fluorescence indicators (Figure 3(a),(b)) were typical of DOM released from pine litter (Beggs & Summers, 2011; Berg & McClaugherty, 2014; Reckhow, et al, 1990; Yavitt & Fahey, 1984). The similar forest composition and soil C content of the adjacent hillslopes suggest that pre‐harvest DOM differences would have been minimal (Table S2, Reuss et al, 1997; Stottlemyer & Troendle, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decomposed litters were produced through a decomposition experiment carried out under field conditions using the litterbag method (Berg & McClaugherty, 2014). Briefly, large (30 × 30 cm) terylene litterbags (mesh size 1.5 mm) were filled with 10 g of litter and placed over the soil surface under the canopy of A. glutinosa .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%