2011
DOI: 10.2514/1.b34204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decomposition Measurements of RP-1, RP-2, JP-7, n-Dodecane, and Tetrahydroquinoline in Shock Tubes

Abstract: Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Info… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The shock tube employed for the experimental portion of this work is that used by Haylett, MacDonald, and Campbell at Stanford, as briefly introduced in the literature review above [1][2][3][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69]. Details of the algorithm that accounts for the presence of aerosol droplets are somewhat dependent on the specific experimental configuration, although the general procedure described herein is applicable to a wide variety of aerosol shock tubes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The shock tube employed for the experimental portion of this work is that used by Haylett, MacDonald, and Campbell at Stanford, as briefly introduced in the literature review above [1][2][3][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69]. Details of the algorithm that accounts for the presence of aerosol droplets are somewhat dependent on the specific experimental configuration, although the general procedure described herein is applicable to a wide variety of aerosol shock tubes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique allowed for larger fuel loading than some previous experiments, but one drawback of this turbulent mixing strategy was that the aerosol droplet number density throughout the tube was not uniform. This work was continued by Haylett, MacDonald, and Campbell, who measured fuel ignition delay times and studied reaction kinetics behind reflected shocks in aerosol mixtures [1][2][3][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69]. Their fuel-loading procedure involved producing a tank of aerosol using nebulizers and then drawing this mixture into the tube through a sliding endwall gate valve in a laminar plug flow.…”
Section: Aerosol Loading In Shock Tubesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By this method, shock tube researchers can avoid using extreme mixing tank and shock tube heating in order to increase the fuel vapor pressure and generate enough fuel vapor for experimentation, as has been done historically. [36][37][38] Such heating is problematic because it can introduce issues of partial fuel distillation and pre-experimental fuel decomposition. 16 Figure 11 applies Eqs.…”
Section: Mixing Tank/shock Tube Volume Ratio Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%