Polymorphism is universal in organic
crystals like conventional
energetic materials (EMs), and it may cause a difference in thermal
stability, one of the most important properties of EMs. Nevertheless,
deep insights into the differences of polymorphic EMs are lacking.
2,4,6,8,10,12-Hexanitro-2,4,6,8,10,12-hexaazaisowurtzitane (CL-20)
is the most powerful EM commercialized already and possesses three
polymorphs stabilized at common condition, which exhibit many differences
in properties and performances. However, the underlying mechanism
responsible for these differences remains unclear. In this work, a
self-consistent charge density functional tight binding scheme and
molecular dynamics simulations are combined to reveal the difference
in the decay mechanism of the three polymorphs of CL-20, with considerations
of an extreme of volume constraint and two heating types. The lower
thermal activity of ε-CL-20 is distinguished from β- and
γ-CL-20 at a relatively low temperature of 1000 K, as only ε-CL-20
does not decompose in the time scale of the simulation of 20 ps. The
lower thermal activity of ε-CL-20 is partly responsible for
its lower impact sensitivity. Two relatively high temperatures of
1500 and 2000 K cannot differentiate their decay activities. Moreover,
the unimolecular N–N breakage governs the first steps of the
thermal decay of all of the three polymorphs. Five types of bond cleavages,
including the NO2 partitions from the 5- and 6-membered
rings, the cleavage of C–N bonds of the 5- and 6-membered rings,
and the C–C bond breakage, are observed in the decay. Interestingly,
all of the five types of ignitions are not be observed in any case.
Besides, we find that the low temperature disfavors the formation
of the stable products of N2 and CO2. These
results of the thermal decay of polymorphic EMs are expected to give
deep insights into the complicated sensitivity mechanism of EMs.