The traditional technologies for odor removal of thiol usually create either secondary pollution for scrubbing, adsorption, and absorption processes, or sulfur (S) poisoning for catalytic incineration. This study applied a laboratory-scale radio-frequency plasma reactor to destructive percentage-grade concentrations of odorous dimethyl sulfide (CH 3 SCH 3 , or DMS). Odor was diminished effectively via reforming DMS into mainly carbon disulfide (CS 2 ) or sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ). The removal efficiencies of DMS elevated significantly with a lower feeding concentration of DMS or a higher applied rf power. A greater inlet oxygen (O 2 )/DMS molar ratio slightly improved the removal efficiency. In an O 2 -free environment, DMS was converted primarily to CS 2 , methane (CH 4 ), acetylene (C 2 H 2 ), ethylene (C 2 H 4 ), and hydrogen (H 2 ), with traces of hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S), methyl mercaptan (CH 3 SH), and dimethyl disulfide. In an O 2 -containing environment, the species detected were SO 2 , CS 2 , carbonyl sulfide, carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), CH 4 , C 2 H 4 , C 2 H 2 , H 2 , formaldehyde, and methanol. Differences in yield of products were functions of the amounts of added O 2 and the applied power. This study provided useful information for gaining insight into the reaction pathways for the DMS dissociation and the formation of products in the plasmolysis and conversion processes.
INTRODUCTIONDimethyl sulfide (CH 3 SCH 3 , or DMS) is an odorous organosulfur pollutant subject to strong public criticism. Natural sources of DMS include oceanic emissions, marine biogenic sources, and terrestrial biogenic sources. 1 In industry, DMS is emitted to the atmosphere from the incomplete combustion of coal and oil, synthetic fibers and resins, petroleum refining process, Kraft paper mills, synthetic polymer spinning, tannery process, and so on. 2,3 The olfactory detection threshold of DMS is ϳ0.001 ppm, fairly close to that of methyl mercaptan (CH 3 SH) (0.002 ppm), ethyl mercaptan (C 2 H 5 SH) (0.001 ppm),