1996
DOI: 10.1080/00207179608921712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decomposition of generalized frequency response functions for nonlinear systems using symbolic computation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, where all frequency variables are limited by the sampling frequency. In addition, as the nonlinear degree M in an identified NARX model is often selected to be low to reduce complexity and avoid possible unstable models (Napoli & Piroddi, 2010;Zhu et al, 2015), Billings, 1989, Billings & Yusof, 1996, the specific form of function , p m p C  can be determined using computer codes conducting symbolic computations.…”
Section: The Generalized Output Bound Characteristic Function (Gobcf)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, where all frequency variables are limited by the sampling frequency. In addition, as the nonlinear degree M in an identified NARX model is often selected to be low to reduce complexity and avoid possible unstable models (Napoli & Piroddi, 2010;Zhu et al, 2015), Billings, 1989, Billings & Yusof, 1996, the specific form of function , p m p C  can be determined using computer codes conducting symbolic computations.…”
Section: The Generalized Output Bound Characteristic Function (Gobcf)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A symbolic procedure is proposed in Reference [21] to address this issue but unfortunately produces an overly complicated solution since permutations for general frequency inputs are considered. Thus, a limit of up to a 5th order general frequency response function is calculated in Reference [21]. For SIDF applications where n is an odd integer, the values of jo 1 ; jo 2 ; .…”
Section: Combinatorial Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%