2016
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decomposition of Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Signals Using Oblique Subspace Projections: Applications in Brain Hemodynamic Monitoring

Abstract: Clinical data is comprised by a large number of synchronously collected biomedical signals that are measured at different locations. Deciphering the interrelationships of these signals can yield important information about their dependence providing some useful clinical diagnostic data. For instance, by computing the coupling between Near-Infrared Spectroscopy signals (NIRS) and systemic variables the status of the hemodynamic regulation mechanisms can be assessed. In this paper we introduce an algorithm for t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data analyses were performed by 14 participating centres on 44 datasets from 22 volunteers with two measurements each. The following dCA analysis methods were used: TFA (Reinhard et al, 2003a, Liu et al, 2005, van Beek et al, 2010, Gommer et al, 2010, Panerai, 2014, Mitsis et al, 2002, Zhang et al, 1998, Meel-van den Abeelen et al, 2014a, Muller et al, 2003, Muller and Osterreich, 2014, Panerai et al, 1998a, Laguerre expansion of 1 st -order Volterra kernels or finite impulse response models (Marmarelis, 2004, Marmarelis et al, 2013, Marmarelis et al, 2014b, Mitsis et al, 2004, Mitsis et al, 2009, wavelet analysis (Peng et al, 2010, Torrence and Webster, 1999, Grinsted et al, 2004, parametric finite-impulse response filter based methods (Panerai et al, 2000, Simpson et al, 2001, ARI anaysis (Panerai et al, 1998b), autoregressive moving average (ARMA) based ARI methods and variant ARI methods (Panerai et al, 2003), autoregressive with exogenous input (ARX) methods (Liu and Allen, 2002, Liu et al, 2003, Panerai et al, 2003 and correlation coefficient-like indices (Heskamp et al, 2013, Caicedo et al, 2016. A summary of the methods and corresponding references are given in Table 1.…”
Section: Dca Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data analyses were performed by 14 participating centres on 44 datasets from 22 volunteers with two measurements each. The following dCA analysis methods were used: TFA (Reinhard et al, 2003a, Liu et al, 2005, van Beek et al, 2010, Gommer et al, 2010, Panerai, 2014, Mitsis et al, 2002, Zhang et al, 1998, Meel-van den Abeelen et al, 2014a, Muller et al, 2003, Muller and Osterreich, 2014, Panerai et al, 1998a, Laguerre expansion of 1 st -order Volterra kernels or finite impulse response models (Marmarelis, 2004, Marmarelis et al, 2013, Marmarelis et al, 2014b, Mitsis et al, 2004, Mitsis et al, 2009, wavelet analysis (Peng et al, 2010, Torrence and Webster, 1999, Grinsted et al, 2004, parametric finite-impulse response filter based methods (Panerai et al, 2000, Simpson et al, 2001, ARI anaysis (Panerai et al, 1998b), autoregressive moving average (ARMA) based ARI methods and variant ARI methods (Panerai et al, 2003), autoregressive with exogenous input (ARX) methods (Liu and Allen, 2002, Liu et al, 2003, Panerai et al, 2003 and correlation coefficient-like indices (Heskamp et al, 2013, Caicedo et al, 2016. A summary of the methods and corresponding references are given in Table 1.…”
Section: Dca Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, rScO 2 was corrected for changes in SaO 2 using oblique subspace projections. 22 This mathematical model decouples the linked dynamics between different underlying subsystems (SaO 2 and CBF) in order to decompose the observed output (rScO 2 ) in terms of the partial contributions of each input variable. The contribution of SaO 2 in the rScO 2 signal is hereby eliminated, which makes the residual component a more correct surrogate for CBF, suitable for the assessment of CAR.…”
Section: Clinical Characteristics and Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although used by Riera et al, this correction was not applied since they excluded the SaO 2 signals in their analysis ( 34 ). Caicedo et al proposed the use of oblique sub-space projections (ObSP) ( 35 , 36 ). ObSP makes use of sub-space system identification that uses input-output observations of the system in order to produce a mathematical model that can explain the measured output.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%