2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2016.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decomposition of tourism greenhouse gas emissions: Revealing the dynamics between tourism economic growth, technological efficiency, and carbon emissions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
73
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
73
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, technical change had a significantly negative effect, reflecting that technical progress can effectively inhibit the growth of tourism CO 2 emissions. The result is in line with the findings of Robaina‐Alves et al () and Sun (), who noted that technical progress can reduce tourism CO 2 emissions. On average, technical change can reduce tourism CO 2 emissions by 13.57% per year, which was the most important factor for restraining CO 2 emissions growth compared with the other six components.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, technical change had a significantly negative effect, reflecting that technical progress can effectively inhibit the growth of tourism CO 2 emissions. The result is in line with the findings of Robaina‐Alves et al () and Sun (), who noted that technical progress can reduce tourism CO 2 emissions. On average, technical change can reduce tourism CO 2 emissions by 13.57% per year, which was the most important factor for restraining CO 2 emissions growth compared with the other six components.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The proposed method is applied to examine the sources of changes in tourism CO 2 emissions, and the main findings and implications show the following: The scale effect was found to be the dominant factor driving tourism CO 2 emissions growth, indicating that mainly the scale expansion of tourism economic outputs is responsible for the sharp rise of tourism CO 2 emissions. This result echoes the findings of Tang et al () and Sun (). Over the last few decades, China's tourism industry has experienced significant growth in tourist arrivals and economic outputs, which dramatically increased the use of tourism transportation, accommodation, catering, and other service facilities, resulting in soaring energy consumption and CO 2 emissions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The top-down method is mainly based on the use of national tourism satellite accounts [24,25], or is based on national economic accounting and uses the input-output model to estimate the energy consumption and carbon emissions of the tourism industry [26,27]. The bottom-up method divides the tourism industry into the three categories of tourism transportation, accommodation, and tourism activities, and the energy consumption and carbon emissions of the tourism industry are estimated based on tourists' consumption of these three categories [28,29].…”
Section: "Bottom Up" Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Against this background, TCF analysis focuses on environmental issues caused by large-scale tourism, particularly its energy consumption and CO 2 emissions (defined as the amount of CO 2-eq emissions caused directly and indirectly by tourism activity), which have been widely researched at various scales, such as analyses for the countries of New Zealand [18], Sweden [19], Australia [20], Spain [21,22], Iceland [23], and China [24][25][26]; the regions of Taiwan [27][28][29], Wales [30], and Poole [31]; and even the scenic locations of the Penghu Islands [32] and Huangshan National Park [33]. TCF analysis excels at assessing the impact of tourism greenhouse gas emissions on climate change and identifying the contribution of tourism carbon emissions to climate change at the global scale, which has become a key research field.…”
Section: Rootsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few longitudinal studies have examined the tourism footprint based on different regions and time series analyses, although the analyses by Cadarso et al [22], Sharp et al [23], Sun [29] and Tang et al [47] are based on a time series. This deficit means that we cannot effectively understand the dynamic change trend in the tourism footprint and the impact of tourism activities on the environment across time dimensions.…”
Section: Performing Space-time Calculations Of the Tourism Footprintmentioning
confidence: 99%