We analyse numerically an SU(3) Higgs model with complete symmetry breaking and radial degree of freedom on asymmetric, periodic lattices. The character of both the Higgs and deconfining transitions is found to depend on the Higgs self-coupling and on a parameter which may simulate the number of flavours. In particular, an increase in the latter leads to the disappearance of the deconfining transition for small Higgs masses.1. Introduction. The phase structure of gauge models with Higgs fields that "break the symmetry completely" in the traditional perturbative language still remains insufficiently understood. The main reason is the so-called duality [1][2][3] between confinement and the Higgs mechanism and -closely related to it -the nonexistence of a simple order parameter characterizing the Higgs ("broken symmetry") phase unambiguously.On the other hand the popular "inflationary scenarios" for the very early universe [4,5] rely in an essential way on the existence of a first-order transition between the "broken" and "unbroken" phases at * Presented at the "Lattice co-ordination meeting", CERN, Geneva, December 1984. 1 Present address: University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA. 2 Present address: Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
60least at high temperature. Earlier Monte Carlo searches for such a phenomenon in SU(2) models both with adjoint [6,7] and fundamental Higgs [8,9] do not always give unambiguous evidence of its occurrence. In this paper we go from SU(2) to SU(3). For this group it is not quite as straightforward to "completely break the symmetry" as for SU (2); a single fundamental SU(3) Higgs field would still leave an SU(2) subgroup unbroken. What would be needed is a "flavour" multiplet of fundamental Higgs fields. On the other hand, in the case of SU(2), "complete breakdown" is achieved by a single fundamental Higgs field which can also be described by an SU(2) matrix, together with a radia/degree of freedom if desired. This suggests to try to achieve "complete breakdown" in SU(3) also by choosing for the Higgs fields multiples of SU(3) matrices. At first we thought that this choice would not be in any essential way different from a conventional model with a 0370-2693/85/$ 03.30