Using articles drawn from the years 1996-1999, this paper updates and expands Jack Niemonen's 1997 TAS analysis of the articles dealing with race and ethnicity in the four core sociology journals. We found a greater rate of publication and several new substantive areas incorporating race and ethnicity, but many of the patterns Niemonen identified remain in place. These articles are highly quantitative, rely heavily on U.S. Census categories, tend to explain racial and ethnic phenomenon as by-products of broader social forces (such as class-based stratification), and subsume these analyses under the headings of alternative subfields. Niemonen used these findings to offer a powerful critique of the status of race and ethnicity in sociology, the underdevelopment of the racial and ethnic relations "problematic," and its marginalization within the discipline as a whole. To reassess these interpretations and conclusions, we examined the relationships between methodology and substance, and compared the main sample with a subset of more specialized articles focused on race and ethnicity. We found a close connection between quantitative methods and the use of Census definitions of race and ethnicity, but surprisingly few differences between the race and ethnic subset and the more inclusive main sample appeared. These findings allow us to offer support and some important qualifications to Niemonen's original conclusions.Racial and ethnic relations have long been a core concern for sociologists, especially in the United States. The last twenty-five years witnessed prolific production of works in this area. Many of the most publicly prominent sociological publications in the last decade or so have focused specifically on racial issues, including Wilson's trilogy on race and class . Yet in spite of such high-profile publications and the de facto inclusion of race and ethnicity as variables in much sociological research, questions about the theoretical premises underlying the subfield of race and ethnic relations, as well as its status in the discipline as a whole, abound. Some have suggested that sociological investigations that address the topic are concerned primarily with documenting the existence of racial inequality rather than exploring its causes. Joe Feagin, for ex-Douglas Hartmann is an associate professor and Paul R. Croll and Katja Guenther are graduate students in the