Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Grit 2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-57389-8_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deconstructing Grit’s Validity: The Case for Revising Grit Measures and Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the degree to which simple structure was exhibited across all items in each EFA solution ( Table 2 ) appears to reinforce the appropriateness of treating PE and CI as separate constructs. Collectively, these results support the position of Tynan (2021) who recently argued that there “is growing evidence that perseverance [of effort] and consistency [of interests] are two separate constructs, and ‘overall grit’ is not psychometrically meaningful” (p. 144). These results make an important contribution of clarity because there is a high degree of inconsistency in the sport psychology literature with respect to whether researchers work with a single composite grit score (which is akin to treating grit as a unidimensional construct) or separate PE and CI subscale scores (which treats grit as a multidimensional construct) ( Cormier et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, the degree to which simple structure was exhibited across all items in each EFA solution ( Table 2 ) appears to reinforce the appropriateness of treating PE and CI as separate constructs. Collectively, these results support the position of Tynan (2021) who recently argued that there “is growing evidence that perseverance [of effort] and consistency [of interests] are two separate constructs, and ‘overall grit’ is not psychometrically meaningful” (p. 144). These results make an important contribution of clarity because there is a high degree of inconsistency in the sport psychology literature with respect to whether researchers work with a single composite grit score (which is akin to treating grit as a unidimensional construct) or separate PE and CI subscale scores (which treats grit as a multidimensional construct) ( Cormier et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…We further note that Duckworth et al (2021) recently acknowledged that saving test administration time with the 8-item Grit-S may not be “worth the cost of omitting four Grit Scale [i.e., Grit-O] items with strong content validity” (p. 574). Such sentiment further points to the potential benefits of using the Grit-O (over the Grit-S) as the instrument of choice when measuring grit in athletes (for a related discussion see Tynan, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also urge future research to address the current scepticisms raised against grit. This will include better theorizing, measurement, and methodological approaches towards understanding grit (Datu, 2021;Tynan, 2021; and determining the various antecedents/ outcomes of grit in various contexts. Furthermore, research on interventions to develop grit is needed (Van Der Vaart et al, 2021) and the possible aversive effects such should be explored (Jordan et al, 2019).…”
Section: Implications Limitations and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the majority of studies suggest that most of the predictive power of grit comes from the perseverance of effort dimension and not consistency of interest (Bowman et al, 2015; Credé et al, 2017; Datu et al, 2015; Disabato et al, 2018; Goodman et al, 2016). For overviews of issues related to the concept and proposals for refining it, see Credé (2018), Datu (2021), and Tynan (2021).…”
Section: Gritmentioning
confidence: 99%