2020
DOI: 10.1177/2057150x20973802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deconstructing hyper-selectivity: Are the socioeconomic attainments of second-generation Asian Americans only due to their class background?

Abstract: Recent studies by Jennifer Lee and Min Zhou claim that “hyper-selectivity” is the primary causal factor accounting for the high average educational attainment of second-generation Asian Americans. We critically assess hyper-selectivity, which has not been carefully evaluated in prior research. We argue that hyper-selectivity is inadequately conceptualized and is not clearly supported by data on immigration or income mobility. Hyper-selectivity ignores accumulated facts about Asian American family processes rel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(142 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Children from the lowest quintile are much more likely to become poor adults than are children from the upper quintile. As shown in Table 2, this class effect is substantial (i.e., double-digit in terms of percentage points) for all of the races by gender groups, with the slight exception of Asians, who are known for an exceptionally high level of upward mobility (Chetty et al 2020;Sakamoto and Wang 2021). Tables 2 and 3 further indicate that the class effects and the minority effects tend to be slightly less disadvantageous for females as compared to males for each racial category.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Children from the lowest quintile are much more likely to become poor adults than are children from the upper quintile. As shown in Table 2, this class effect is substantial (i.e., double-digit in terms of percentage points) for all of the races by gender groups, with the slight exception of Asians, who are known for an exceptionally high level of upward mobility (Chetty et al 2020;Sakamoto and Wang 2021). Tables 2 and 3 further indicate that the class effects and the minority effects tend to be slightly less disadvantageous for females as compared to males for each racial category.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, as discussed by Sakamoto and Wang (2021), these typical discussions are not very clear about the specific variables that are being selected. Because the selectivity is usually being measured with regard to educational attainment, perhaps an important characteristic that is being selected is educational aspirations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%