2022
DOI: 10.1039/d2ta01737g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deconstructing proton transport through atomically thin monolayer CVD graphene membranes

Abstract: Selective proton (H+) permeation through the atomically thin lattice of graphene and other 2D materials offers new opportunities for energy conversion/storage and novel separations. Practical applications necessitate scalable synthesis via...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image (Figure B) of the as-synthesized CVD graphene on Cu foil shows wrinkles (originating from the differences in thermal expansions of graphene and copper), indicating a continuous layer. , Raman spectroscopy (Figure C) with the characteristic graphene peaks (2D ∼2700 cm –1 , G ∼1600 cm –1 ) and the absence of a D peak (∼1350 cm –1 ) confirms the high quality of the synthesized monolayer ( I 2D / I G >1) graphene film . The SEM image of graphene on PCTE support (Figure D) shows a majority of PCTE pores with ∼200 nm diameter covered with graphene (darker contrast in SEM), indicating successful transfer, along with some uncovered regions (brighter regions in SEM) due to tears in the graphene from the manual pressing step of the transfer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image (Figure B) of the as-synthesized CVD graphene on Cu foil shows wrinkles (originating from the differences in thermal expansions of graphene and copper), indicating a continuous layer. , Raman spectroscopy (Figure C) with the characteristic graphene peaks (2D ∼2700 cm –1 , G ∼1600 cm –1 ) and the absence of a D peak (∼1350 cm –1 ) confirms the high quality of the synthesized monolayer ( I 2D / I G >1) graphene film . The SEM image of graphene on PCTE support (Figure D) shows a majority of PCTE pores with ∼200 nm diameter covered with graphene (darker contrast in SEM), indicating successful transfer, along with some uncovered regions (brighter regions in SEM) due to tears in the graphene from the manual pressing step of the transfer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…To analyze the proton transportation behavior in different nanochannels, an extra proton was put into the systems forming a hydronium ion with a random water molecule. Since 0.1 M HCl is most commonly used in proton conductivity measurement experiments, , one extra proton in our simulation box, with the corresponding pH even lower than 1, is comparable to the experimental proton transport environment. To identify the hydronium ion from water molecules, we scanned the trajectory files and if one oxygen molecule was found with three bonds attached, then it would be judged as the stable hydronium ion at that frame, while for the transition state hydronium ion, the oxygen from two neighboring water molecules both formed a hydrogen bond with the proton, the closer one was thought to be the hydronium ion; 20 sets of 100 ps simulations of every studied case were analyzed to guarantee the statistical significance of the results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Graphene on Cu is cut to ∼2.25 cm 2 pieces and N211-K + is placed on top. A thin layer of Nafion solution (1100 MW, 1 wt %) is applied to a PTFE-coated fiberglass mat (15 mil thickness) and placed on the N211-K + . An additional fiberglass mat is placed on the bottom, below the graphene on Cu and the whole stack is hot pressed at 145 °C for 3 min at ∼1000 psi.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A thin layer of Nafion solution (1100 MW, 1 wt %) is applied to a PTFE-coated fiberglass mat (15 mil thickness) and placed on the N211-K + . 90 An additional fiberglass mat is placed on the bottom, below the graphene on Cu and the whole stack is hot pressed at 145 °C for 3 min at ∼1000 psi. The bottom fiberglass mat is removed and the remaining Cu|Graphene|N211-K + |fiberglass stack is pre-etched in APS solution (0.2 M) for 15 min and rinsed in DI water to remove the bottom layer of graphene from the Cu.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%