2016
DOI: 10.5547/01956574.37.3.kgil
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deconstructing Solar Photovoltaic Pricing: The Role of Market Structure, Technology, and Policy

Abstract: Solar photovoltaic (PV) system prices in the United States display considerable heterogeneity both across geographic locations and within a given location. Such heterogeneity may arise due to state and federal policies, differences in market structure, and other factors that influence demand and costs. This paper examines the relative importance of such factors on equilibrium solar PV system prices in the United States using a detailed dataset of roughly 100,000 recent residential and small commercial installa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Figure A1 in Appendix A presents the size distribution of PV systems in the range between zero and 30 kW in the upper panel, between four and six kW in the lower left panel and between nine and eleven kW in the lower right panel. There are not disproportionately many systems sized just below five or ten kW, affirming that the system size is determined by the consumer's needs rather than strategic considerations (see also Gillingham et al, 2016a;Pless and van Benthem, 2019, for similar conclusions on the sizing of PV systems).…”
Section: Program Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…3 Figure A1 in Appendix A presents the size distribution of PV systems in the range between zero and 30 kW in the upper panel, between four and six kW in the lower left panel and between nine and eleven kW in the lower right panel. There are not disproportionately many systems sized just below five or ten kW, affirming that the system size is determined by the consumer's needs rather than strategic considerations (see also Gillingham et al, 2016a;Pless and van Benthem, 2019, for similar conclusions on the sizing of PV systems).…”
Section: Program Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This association is however not statistically significant when dropping observations in the vicinity of a rebate level drop date (Table C3, Appendix C). A larger transaction price per Watt could again be attributed to less standardized installations in residential consumers, such as carport structures (see Gillingham et al, 2016a, for a similar reasoning).…”
Section: Subsidy Levels and Transaction Prices Per Watt Of Pv Systemsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Kwan (2012) also models residential PV adoption, however he measures the effects of an average level of state incentives. There is some recent evidence that increased solar incentive policy is associated with price increases (Gillingham et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%