This dissertation focuses on the economics of electricity generation. I aim to answer three main questions: After controlling for outside market forces, how did acid rain regulation impact Eastern coal production? How have the fundamental relationships in the natural gas market changed since deregulation, especially given the rise of production from shale resources? And how have sub-state policies affected the adoption of residential solar generation installations? For each question, I use economic tools to provide empirical answers which will contribute both to the academic literature as well as energy policy. My first essay looks at the coal production in the Eastern US from 1983-2012. It is widely understood that the quantity of coal produced in this region declined during this time period, though its causes are debated. While some have identified the cause to be outside economic forces, the prevailing view is that federal regulation was the main driver. By controlling for outside market forces, this paper is able to estimate the effect that the differing regulatory periods have had on coal production. Results demonstrate how in general the regulatory phases of the Acid Rain Program are associated with decreases in production in the Illinois and Appalachian basins, however with varying magnitudes. Further, there are some areas that saw some increases. The essay also measure the mitigating impact that the installation of 'scrubber' units had on production. Overall, this essay provides a more nuanced look at the relationship between coal production and regulation during this time period. You learn a lot getting a PhD. I mean, that's kind of the point. But along with all the math and theory, you're given ample time to learn about the life choice you're making. And now on my way out, I can tell you with a high degree of certainty: it's a bad one. It's not that the costs outweigh the benefits, though they are formidable: low pay, geographic and social isolation, being sent to the back of the prestige line. These of course were all known prior and definitely realized during. But while most say the long-term benefits will eventually pay off, it's important to consider that they're all conditional on passing. This is not the slightest bit guaranteed, much less in any reasonable time-frame. Pursing a doctorate is a bad choice because of how unbelievably lucky you need to be to actually finish. See, the thing is, your ideas are probably terrible. Solidarity: mine are too. We all tend to enjoy our own because we don't really like to consider whether we're wrong. The academic market for bad ideas is highly saturated, and to create anything different, you need a lot of help. Throughout my doctorate, I was extremely fortunate to have a small group of people who were willing and able to provide direction, clarification, and assistance. Without them, I would have been lost.