2016
DOI: 10.4324/9781315539744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Roeslan Saleh, criminal responsibility is defined as an objective offense that is present in the crime and that the perpetrator subjectively qualifies for punishment for (Sujiantoro & Refangga, 2023). The foundation of error serves as the foundation for creators, while the base of crime serves as the foundation for legality (Cornell et al, 2016). This implies that the offender will only face consequences if it is shown that he committed the offense (Apel, 2013).…”
Section: Concept Of Criminal Liability For Businessesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Roeslan Saleh, criminal responsibility is defined as an objective offense that is present in the crime and that the perpetrator subjectively qualifies for punishment for (Sujiantoro & Refangga, 2023). The foundation of error serves as the foundation for creators, while the base of crime serves as the foundation for legality (Cornell et al, 2016). This implies that the offender will only face consequences if it is shown that he committed the offense (Apel, 2013).…”
Section: Concept Of Criminal Liability For Businessesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consolidation of these steps was guided by deconstructive approaches (Fook & Pease, 2016) to the disassemblement of authoritative voices within common discourses. Stemming from these approaches was the aspiration to look not only at what social justice’s definitions include but also at what they do not include (Cornell, Rosenfeld, & Carlson, 2016) and what some of the consequences that such lacunae (that are endless, fluid, and subjective) may entail for the social work profession. Also drawn from such approaches was the attempt to critically reflect on what is considered dominant or widely acceptable knowledge, without totally dismissing its validity (Canagarajah, 2002), but rather in a manner that positions it as one interpretation among others of what we mean when referencing social justice.…”
Section: A Proposed Framework For Pluralistic Deconstruction and Redementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A partir de agora, o trabalho analisa alguma das principais ideias de Jacques Derrida no que concerne a esses temas, para tentar chegar a algumas respostas. (Cornell et al, 1992), o filósofo traz suas ideias da desconstrução para pensar o Direito e a Justiça. A proposta de Drucilla Cornell para o evento era a de discutir a desconstrução e a possibilidade da justiça.…”
Section: Desconstrução Direito E Hermenêuticaunclassified